From: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
To: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
Cc: qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] mttcg/i386: Patch instruction using async_safe_* framework
Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2017 19:09:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <878tl3d5zu.fsf@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJhHMCDG5vcrsRp3ANyWBZLSEV3deaeYq8EF2zu+Buo5rwPa2w@mail.gmail.com>
Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com> writes:
> Can someone please pick this up?
It needs to be re-posted with the review tag and ping Paolo re: async
work for KVM.
>
> Thanks,
>
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 12:42 AM, Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com> wrote:
>> In mttcg, calling pause_all_vcpus() during execution from the
>> generated TBs causes a deadlock if some vCPU is waiting for exclusive
>> execution in start_exclusive(). Fix this by using the aync_safe_*
>> framework instead of pausing vcpus for patching instructions.
>>
>> CC: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
>> CC: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
>> CC: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> hw/i386/kvmvapic.c | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>> 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/i386/kvmvapic.c b/hw/i386/kvmvapic.c
>> index 82a4955..11b0d49 100644
>> --- a/hw/i386/kvmvapic.c
>> +++ b/hw/i386/kvmvapic.c
>> @@ -383,8 +383,7 @@ static void patch_byte(X86CPU *cpu, target_ulong addr, uint8_t byte)
>> cpu_memory_rw_debug(CPU(cpu), addr, &byte, 1, 1);
>> }
>>
>> -static void patch_call(VAPICROMState *s, X86CPU *cpu, target_ulong ip,
>> - uint32_t target)
>> +static void patch_call(X86CPU *cpu, target_ulong ip, uint32_t target)
>> {
>> uint32_t offset;
>>
>> @@ -393,23 +392,24 @@ static void patch_call(VAPICROMState *s, X86CPU *cpu, target_ulong ip,
>> cpu_memory_rw_debug(CPU(cpu), ip + 1, (void *)&offset, sizeof(offset), 1);
>> }
>>
>> -static void patch_instruction(VAPICROMState *s, X86CPU *cpu, target_ulong ip)
>> +struct PatchInfo {
>> + VAPICHandlers *handler;
>> + target_ulong ip;
>> +};
>> +
>> +static void do_patch_instruction(CPUState *cs, run_on_cpu_data data)
>> {
>> - CPUState *cs = CPU(cpu);
>> - CPUX86State *env = &cpu->env;
>> - VAPICHandlers *handlers;
>> + X86CPU *x86_cpu = X86_CPU(cs);
>> + CPUX86State *env = &x86_cpu->env;
>> + struct PatchInfo *info = (struct PatchInfo *) data.host_ptr;
>> + VAPICHandlers *handlers = info->handler;
>> + target_ulong ip = info->ip;
>> uint8_t opcode[2];
>> uint32_t imm32 = 0;
>> target_ulong current_pc = 0;
>> target_ulong current_cs_base = 0;
>> uint32_t current_flags = 0;
>>
>> - if (smp_cpus == 1) {
>> - handlers = &s->rom_state.up;
>> - } else {
>> - handlers = &s->rom_state.mp;
>> - }
>> -
>> if (!kvm_enabled()) {
>> cpu_get_tb_cpu_state(env, ¤t_pc, ¤t_cs_base,
>> ¤t_flags);
>> @@ -421,48 +421,70 @@ static void patch_instruction(VAPICROMState *s, X86CPU *cpu, target_ulong ip)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> - pause_all_vcpus();
>> -
>> cpu_memory_rw_debug(cs, ip, opcode, sizeof(opcode), 0);
>>
>> switch (opcode[0]) {
>> case 0x89: /* mov r32 to r/m32 */
>> - patch_byte(cpu, ip, 0x50 + modrm_reg(opcode[1])); /* push reg */
>> - patch_call(s, cpu, ip + 1, handlers->set_tpr);
>> + patch_byte(x86_cpu, ip, 0x50 + modrm_reg(opcode[1])); /* push reg */
>> + patch_call(x86_cpu, ip + 1, handlers->set_tpr);
>> break;
>> case 0x8b: /* mov r/m32 to r32 */
>> - patch_byte(cpu, ip, 0x90);
>> - patch_call(s, cpu, ip + 1, handlers->get_tpr[modrm_reg(opcode[1])]);
>> + patch_byte(x86_cpu, ip, 0x90);
>> + patch_call(x86_cpu, ip + 1, handlers->get_tpr[modrm_reg(opcode[1])]);
>> break;
>> case 0xa1: /* mov abs to eax */
>> - patch_call(s, cpu, ip, handlers->get_tpr[0]);
>> + patch_call(x86_cpu, ip, handlers->get_tpr[0]);
>> break;
>> case 0xa3: /* mov eax to abs */
>> - patch_call(s, cpu, ip, handlers->set_tpr_eax);
>> + patch_call(x86_cpu, ip, handlers->set_tpr_eax);
>> break;
>> case 0xc7: /* mov imm32, r/m32 (c7/0) */
>> - patch_byte(cpu, ip, 0x68); /* push imm32 */
>> + patch_byte(x86_cpu, ip, 0x68); /* push imm32 */
>> cpu_memory_rw_debug(cs, ip + 6, (void *)&imm32, sizeof(imm32), 0);
>> cpu_memory_rw_debug(cs, ip + 1, (void *)&imm32, sizeof(imm32), 1);
>> - patch_call(s, cpu, ip + 5, handlers->set_tpr);
>> + patch_call(x86_cpu, ip + 5, handlers->set_tpr);
>> break;
>> case 0xff: /* push r/m32 */
>> - patch_byte(cpu, ip, 0x50); /* push eax */
>> - patch_call(s, cpu, ip + 1, handlers->get_tpr_stack);
>> + patch_byte(x86_cpu, ip, 0x50); /* push eax */
>> + patch_call(x86_cpu, ip + 1, handlers->get_tpr_stack);
>> break;
>> default:
>> abort();
>> }
>>
>> - resume_all_vcpus();
>> + g_free(info);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void patch_instruction(VAPICROMState *s, X86CPU *cpu, target_ulong ip)
>> +{
>> + CPUState *cs = CPU(cpu);
>> + VAPICHandlers *handlers;
>> + struct PatchInfo *info;
>> +
>> + if (smp_cpus == 1) {
>> + handlers = &s->rom_state.up;
>> + } else {
>> + handlers = &s->rom_state.mp;
>> + }
>> +
>> + info = g_new(struct PatchInfo, 1);
>> + info->handler = handlers;
>> + info->ip = ip;
>>
>> if (!kvm_enabled()) {
>> - /* Both tb_lock and iothread_mutex will be reset when
>> - * longjmps back into the cpu_exec loop. */
>> - tb_lock();
>> - tb_gen_code(cs, current_pc, current_cs_base, current_flags, 1);
>> - cpu_loop_exit_noexc(cs);
>> + const run_on_cpu_func fn = do_patch_instruction;
>> +
>> + async_safe_run_on_cpu(cs, fn, RUN_ON_CPU_HOST_PTR(info));
>> + cs->exception_index = EXCP_INTERRUPT;
>> + cpu_loop_exit(cs);
>> }
>> +
>> + pause_all_vcpus();
>> +
>> + do_patch_instruction(cs, RUN_ON_CPU_HOST_PTR(info));
>> +
>> + resume_all_vcpus();
>> + g_free(info);
>> }
>>
>> void vapic_report_tpr_access(DeviceState *dev, CPUState *cs, target_ulong ip,
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>>
--
Alex Bennée
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-07 18:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-24 5:42 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] mttcg/i386: Patch instruction using async_safe_* framework Pranith Kumar
2017-02-24 6:54 ` Richard Henderson
2017-02-24 10:21 ` Alex Bennée
2017-02-24 14:10 ` Pranith Kumar
2017-02-24 14:36 ` Alex Bennée
2017-06-07 16:40 ` Pranith Kumar
2017-06-07 18:09 ` Alex Bennée [this message]
2017-06-07 18:46 ` Pranith Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=878tl3d5zu.fsf@linaro.org \
--to=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=bobby.prani@gmail.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).