From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34468)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1TeTHo-0003rR-3m
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 11:18:01 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1TeTHj-00033p-BQ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 11:17:56 -0500
Received: from mail-ie0-f173.google.com ([209.85.223.173]:55025)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1TeTHj-00033l-6i
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 11:17:51 -0500
Received: by mail-ie0-f173.google.com with SMTP id e13so827405iej.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 08:17:50 -0800 (PST)
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
In-Reply-To: <728430859.16818384.1354284864833.JavaMail.root@redhat.com>
References: <728430859.16818384.1354284864833.JavaMail.root@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 10:17:46 -0600
Message-ID: <878v9j6p5h.fsf@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V7 0/6] VMXNET3 paravirtual NIC device
	implementation
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Dmitry Fleytman <dmitry@daynix.com>
Cc: Yan Vugenfirer <yan@daynix.com>, Gerhard Wiesinger <lists@wiesinger.com>, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>

Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> writes:

>> Yes, we tested this device with various guests (both Linux and
>> Windows) and it also passed WHQL tests for Windows Server 2008 R2
>> OS. The issue is Anthony asked us to write a basic test for the device (a
>> packet transmission test) and we are trying to get some reference
>> code or documentation to do this.
>
> At QEMU summit we agreed that tests would only be required after
> the corresponding virtio model have it (i.e. virtio-scsi for SCSI
> HBAs, virtio-net for NICs, virtio-blk for non-SCSI block devices).
> Since these haven't even been posted, nor has libqos, I believe
> these patches are good to go.

Ack.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

>
> Dmitry is a nice guy anyway and will sure write testcases as soon
> as the infrastructure is in, right? :)
>
> Paolo