From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LRVnN-0001ER-1G for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:02:49 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LRVnM-0001D1-7U for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:02:48 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45374 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LRVnM-0001Cg-2L for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:02:48 -0500 Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:52687) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LRVJH-0007W0-JM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 12:31:44 -0500 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LRNJM-0004Xh-LC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 03:59:16 -0500 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/9] Configurable PCI device addresses References: <87ocxzrvqb.fsf@pike.pond.sub.org> <4978D1B0.5040500@codemonkey.ws> <200901231906.08178.paul@codesourcery.com> <497A1A7B.8030300@codemonkey.ws> From: Markus Armbruster Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 09:55:08 +0100 In-Reply-To: <497A1A7B.8030300@codemonkey.ws> (Anthony Liguori's message of "Fri\, 23 Jan 2009 13\:28\:59 -0600") Message-ID: <878woyla4z.fsf@pike.pond.sub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Paul Brook Anthony Liguori writes: > Paul Brook wrote: >>> I think we're starting to get to the tipping point where we really just >>> need to introduce a machine config file. >>> >>> Paul, you mentioned you were working on something before? Care to >>> update us on the status? >>> >>> I know there was a fair bit of support before for a FDT based machine >>> config. >>> >> >> I have a FDT based machine descriptions working locally. >> > > Can you post what you have? Yes, please!