From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55150) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bQT2f-0000Z5-4C for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2016 01:30:34 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bQT2b-0002id-Ut for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2016 01:30:32 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:45846) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bQT2b-0002iU-LV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2016 01:30:29 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098404.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.11/8.16.0.11) with SMTP id u6M5OKUl094266 for ; Fri, 22 Jul 2016 01:30:28 -0400 Received: from e23smtp09.au.ibm.com (e23smtp09.au.ibm.com [202.81.31.142]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 24a8f19q9g-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 22 Jul 2016 01:30:27 -0400 Received: from localhost by e23smtp09.au.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 22 Jul 2016 15:30:25 +1000 From: Nikunj A Dadhania In-Reply-To: <20160722045920.GQ15941@voom.fritz.box> References: <1468861517-2508-1-git-send-email-nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1468861517-2508-11-git-send-email-nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20160722045920.GQ15941@voom.fritz.box> Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 11:00:18 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <87a8ha9r4l.fsf@abhimanyu.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v1 10/13] target-ppc: add setb instruction List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: David Gibson Cc: qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, benh@kernel.crashing.org, Vivek Andrew Sha David Gibson writes: > [ Unknown signature status ] > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 10:35:14PM +0530, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote: >> From: Vivek Andrew Sha >> >> Returns: >> -1 if bit 0 of CR field is set >> 0 if bit 1 of CR field is set >> 1 otherwise. > > Um.. that description is pretty inadequate. Retuns where? Which CR > field? I will update, its encoded in the opcode. Regards Nikunj