qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
To: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/9] target-i386: make "enforce" flag work as it should
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 15:10:09 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a9sofydq.fsf@codemonkey.ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130104204851.GU18372@otherpad.lan.raisama.net>

Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com> writes:

> The Cc header of the message looks broken. It contained:
>
>   Cc:
>   =?utf-8?q?kvm=40vger=2Ekernel=2Eorg=2C_Gleb_Natapov_=3Cgleb=40redhat=2E?=.=?utf-8?q?com=3E=2C_libvir-list=40redhat=2Ecom=2C_Marcelo_Tosatti_=3Cmtosat?=.=?utf-8?q?ti=40redhat=2Ecom=3E=2C_Igor_Mammedov_=3Cimammedo=40redhat=2Ecom?=.=?utf-8?q?=3E=2C_Jiri_Den

Yes, email sucks :-(

I'm working to fix it... sorry for the noise.

>
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 08:21:22PM -0000, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> This is an automated message generated from the QEMU Patches.
>> Thank you for submitting this patch.  This patch no longer applies to qemu.git.
>
> Cool.  :-)
>
>> 
>> This may have occurred due to:
>>  
>>   1) Changes in mainline requiring your patch to be rebased and re-tested.
>> 
>>   2) Sending the mail using a tool other than git-send-email.  Please use
>>      git-send-email to send patches to QEMU.
>> 
>>   3) Basing this patch off of a branch that isn't tracking the QEMU
>>      master branch.  If that was done purposefully, please include the name
>>      of the tree in the subject line in the future to prevent this message.
>> 
>>      For instance: "[PATCH block-next 1/10] qcow3: add fancy new feature"
>
> What should I do if the patch requires other patches that are on the
> mailing list but no git tree yet? That was the case, here (the series
> depends on the disable-kvm_mmu_op series I sent previously today).

Good question.  In this case, just say [PATCH qom-cpu...] since this is
against the qom-cpu tree.

Or even an RFC tag if that's appropriate.

I wouldn't recommend sending patches meant for merging that depend on
other series still on the list without an RFC tag.  For no other reason
that you'll likely confuse someone trying to apply it.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

>
>> 
>>   4) You no longer wish for this patch to be applied to QEMU.  No additional
>>      action is required on your part.
>> 
>> Nacked-by: QEMU Patches <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
>> 
>> Below is the output from git-am:
>> 
>>     Applying: target-i386: kvm: -cpu host: Use GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID for SVM features
>>     Applying: target-i386: kvm: Enable all supported KVM features for -cpu host
>>     Applying: target-i386: check/enforce: Fix CPUID leaf numbers on error messages
>>     fatal: sha1 information is lacking or useless (target-i386/cpu.c).
>>     Repository lacks necessary blobs to fall back on 3-way merge.
>>     Cannot fall back to three-way merge.
>>     Patch failed at 0003 target-i386: check/enforce: Fix CPUID leaf numbers on error messages
>>     The copy of the patch that failed is found in:
>>        /home/aliguori/.patches/qemu-working/.git/rebase-apply/patch
>>     When you have resolved this problem run "git am --resolved".
>>     If you would prefer to skip this patch, instead run "git am --skip".
>>     To restore the original branch and stop patching run "git am --abort".
>> 
>
> -- 
> Eduardo

  reply	other threads:[~2013-01-04 21:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-04 15:37 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/9] target-i386: make "enforce" flag work as it should Eduardo Habkost
2013-01-04 15:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/9] target-i386: kvm: -cpu host: Use GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID for SVM features Eduardo Habkost
2013-01-04 15:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/9] target-i386: kvm: Enable all supported KVM features for -cpu host Eduardo Habkost
2013-01-04 15:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/9] target-i386: check/enforce: Fix CPUID leaf numbers on error messages Eduardo Habkost
2013-01-04 20:54   ` Blue Swirl
2013-01-04 15:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/9] target-i386: check/enforce: Do not ignore "hypervisor" flag Eduardo Habkost
2013-01-04 15:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/9] target-i386: check/enforce: Check all CPUID.80000001H.EDX bits Eduardo Habkost
2013-01-04 15:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/9] target-i386: check/enforce: Check SVM flag support as well Eduardo Habkost
2013-01-04 15:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 7/9] target-i386: check/enforce: Eliminate check_feat field Eduardo Habkost
2013-01-04 15:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 8/9] target-i386: Call kvm_check_features_against_host() only if CONFIG_KVM is set Eduardo Habkost
2013-01-04 15:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 9/9] target-i386: check/enforce: Check all feature words Eduardo Habkost
     [not found] ` <201301042020.r04KKv0R014816@d01av02.pok.ibm.com>
2013-01-04 20:48   ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/9] target-i386: make "enforce" flag work as it should Eduardo Habkost
2013-01-04 21:10     ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
2013-01-04 21:00 ` Anthony Liguori

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87a9sofydq.fsf@codemonkey.ws \
    --to=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).