From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MRTYI-0003Ah-VK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 12:11:23 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MRTYE-00037F-CZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 12:11:22 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40953 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MRTYE-00037A-84 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 12:11:18 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:50769 helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MRTYE-0004Pf-5h for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 12:11:18 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1MRTYA-0007Oj-Ka for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 16:11:14 +0000 Received: from 209.172.104.10 ([209.172.104.10]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 16:11:14 +0000 Received: from blp by 209.172.104.10 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 16:11:14 +0000 From: Ben Pfaff Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 09:11:17 -0700 Message-ID: <87ab34obfe.fsf@blp.benpfaff.org> References: <1247738940-12061-1-git-send-email-kwolf@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: news Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/4] qemu-iotests: Backing file tests Reply-To: blp@cs.stanford.edu List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Blue Swirl writes: > On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote: >> This series adds some patches for backing files to qemu-iotests. It is meant to >> be applied on top of the recently posted patch introducing test 016. > > The patches use the old FSF's address, the new one is: > > 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor > Boston, MA 02110-1301 > USA When I checked with the FSF a few months ago, about the currently recommended form of the GPL header, I was told that this is perfectly acceptable: You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along with this program. If not, see . Then you don't have to update the address whenever the FSF moves. -- Ben Pfaff http://benpfaff.org