From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0346C636CC for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 12:21:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pSdFc-0007Pi-09; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 07:20:36 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pSdFU-0007Of-TX for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 07:20:29 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.129.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pSdFR-0003KF-V4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 07:20:28 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1676550022; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=JmzyxWbtdqJKAKIt5CL9s7eO+G50nvzkIbOPKJFVY9k=; b=ES5VMQ6E1h8kSa403Lq8gUpLPM8YZid+zwfKHSJDlSXm3G9GuDMMWBEb3vVNq5F87ddPDN rjiIcpBW1PX6LbyClkns3gpVriF0gLaewV2EWeGZX2saaiiElo3wKfjpmM9XHSu2/d4bUl IZP2VOy6K4CFlE+ES4lB8CiltYp86gg= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx3-rdu2.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-643-OCYHTzsuOVyANP7tLMG_NQ-1; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 07:20:05 -0500 X-MC-Unique: OCYHTzsuOVyANP7tLMG_NQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7F723810788; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 12:20:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blackfin.pond.sub.org (unknown [10.39.192.13]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF590492C3C; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 12:20:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by blackfin.pond.sub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B64D821E6A1F; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 13:20:00 +0100 (CET) From: Markus Armbruster To: Juan Quintela Cc: Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?= , Paolo Bonzini , Pavel Dovgalyuk , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , Richard Henderson , Mark Burton , Bill Mills , Marco Liebel , Alexandre Iooss , Mahmoud Mandour , Emilio Cota , Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , "Wei W. Wang" Subject: Re: Future of icount discussion for next KVM call? References: <87bklt9alc.fsf@linaro.org> <87lekxkhes.fsf@secure.mitica> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 13:20:00 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87lekxkhes.fsf@secure.mitica> (Juan Quintela's message of "Thu, 16 Feb 2023 11:56:27 +0100") Message-ID: <87bkltredr.fsf@pond.sub.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.9 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.129.124; envelope-from=armbru@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Juan Quintela writes: > Alex Benn=C3=A9e wrote: >> (replying all because qemu-devel rejected my email again) >> >> On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 at 10:19, Alex Benn=C3=A9e = wrote: >> >>> Hi Juan, >>> >>> Do we have an agenda for next weeks KVM call yet? If there is space I'd >>> like to take some time to discuss the future direction of icount. > > For next week we have: > - more single binary qemu (philippe?) > - TDX migration from intel. > We asked them on the previous call to change their design to transfer > stuff through migration channels and not create a new channel. But I > haven't heard from intel. (wei?) > They agreed to send the slides and post the code before continue > discussion. > > And now I like the title of you topic > > - Future Direction of icount > > O:-) > > So, I will recommend 20 minutes each if Wei shows up, or 30/30 for the > rest. > > What do the rest of the people think. I think we either need fewer topics per call (ideally one), or strictly enforced time limits per topic. I don't fancy meetings where the topic that made me attend falls off the end. The former may necessitate more frequent calls.