From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBC79C2D0E4 for ; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 17:28:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A558241A7 for ; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 17:28:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="YVMcpyBo" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 0A558241A7 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:40776 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kf4mB-0006I8-T0 for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 12:28:19 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55632) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kf4km-0005mE-GC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 12:26:52 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-x344.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::344]:36915) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kf4kk-0002bR-P7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 12:26:52 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-x344.google.com with SMTP id h21so3979728wmb.2 for ; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 09:26:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qsyzZMeq8aidi9nA7AJx3SY7dRgdbzxyet8D12H3+7w=; b=YVMcpyBoWR5E7OaJzRUmVEoN+jmrKoTlMHuMfv4SDjHs4ccYoBdga90IcVrs1nNelo kooEu1AR6O9qqBiaa1x1ZjRNr2Oui9ozoERxz5aBr1J4WaDfe7WF3+7yWGpwVoElv1ex LRuP9bdNuzTTJPotBeiMmUwFoW5NdL2gV5OzyktyD7XoarSsj9L6e7FRBhgfA169o1z8 VfVjWsJdCRDt54nAahFhZBI1up8tOvSeFB12D3WRZSRJqjSvlEzDAhEJK7bOn6vebU1o vitSwA52vJon57TD0Do+icN7xtA6PCAWA8FnfnMlereRdJiT3xTKXOAJ06+5aVCrtsIi +RRw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject :in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qsyzZMeq8aidi9nA7AJx3SY7dRgdbzxyet8D12H3+7w=; b=E9M1Ez1wiXjglJUzFrDdi3eMrS8mhM5BM4S3JbN9nONgEnrtggrmnYbh0cvUWsngk4 hEGbHaxBgNLGb50bkmLHoerGuKDwo5YAAoeU+nLmBpwpe9yQ83jkFsduegHXr00zXAjP y75wwmu65tis5fOofgslFwybaFZAmDSTNwUHt5MYC4pKMTLzQ6Suuc/7XbQxekerY3SK hB2Sefm8ohYnIO4OEdbrQEuhOpPzlZZIIXrPqRZFOqhXGWLwEvUDItWY1WPvWlpRzg83 GVp814kYxeKAsuFdPj3ZT+b2QX3SjTPMko/dXaUuA5r7Kqg9R4aikJTpSBAnb8eYzLVZ D6SQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531+MM4RY1gqQKphMf43Q4s59Jqdd/wMoYDBAP/2kmEWaBRZbdIq lbFicgt+tfUsOX2NS0caqq89VQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwtHkgqc9201aX5R85PXtmUn8rhllVTGJSXOOQ6XEbjnw9gs0sgoij27cbTyhPsslTAjnra+A== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c925:: with SMTP id h5mr143402wml.5.1605634008969; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 09:26:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from zen.linaroharston ([51.148.130.216]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x12sm22264114wrt.18.2020.11.17.09.26.47 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 17 Nov 2020 09:26:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from zen (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zen.linaroharston (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD7101FF7E; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 17:26:46 +0000 (GMT) References: <20201106032921.600200-1-richard.henderson@linaro.org> <8b0e2ecd-0a2d-de71-2fa6-6e47758d4db6@linaro.org> User-agent: mu4e 1.5.7; emacs 28.0.50 From: Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?= To: Joelle van Dyne Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/41] Mirror map JIT memory for TCG In-reply-to: Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 17:26:46 +0000 Message-ID: <87blfvx5bd.fsf@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::344; envelope-from=alex.bennee@linaro.org; helo=mail-wm1-x344.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Richard Henderson , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Joelle van Dyne writes: > Sorry, are you asking for a review from me? I don=E2=80=99t know if I=E2= =80=99m > qualified to review the other patches but I did review the iOS patch. Anyone can review code and given you wrote the original patches you certainly know enough about the flow to give some opinion. If things aren't clear then please do ask questions. The pool of TCG backend reviewers is small enough and helping out does help. Failing that you can always send Tested-by: tags once you've tested a series on the HW. > > -j > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 9:20 AM Richard Henderson > wrote: >> >> On 11/16/20 7:47 PM, Joelle van Dyne wrote: >> > Hi, I'm wondering what the progress is for this patch set and the iOS >> > support one? I know 5.2 is frozen, so will this be considered for 6.0? >> > Apple Silicon Macs are out now and a few people are asking about QEMU >> > support :) >> >> Yes, this will be considered for 6.0. >> >> It does need to be reviewed more completely than a "LGTM", but there's t= ime for >> that. >> >> >> r~ --=20 Alex Benn=C3=A9e