Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 3/4] monitor: more comments on lock-free fleids/funcs

[Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>]

Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> writes:

> On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 10:41:09AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Regarding the subject: what are "fleids"?
>
> Ouch. :( I meant the word "fields".

Can touch that up in my tree.

>> Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> writes:
>> 
>> > Add some explicit comment for both Readline and cpu_set/cpu_get helpers
>> > that they do not need the mon_lock protection.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
>> > ---
>> >  monitor.c | 12 +++++++++++-
>> >  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/monitor.c b/monitor.c
>> > index d6c3c08932..f01589f945 100644
>> > --- a/monitor.c
>> > +++ b/monitor.c
>> > @@ -207,7 +207,16 @@ struct Monitor {
>> >      int suspend_cnt;            /* Needs to be accessed atomically */
>> >      bool skip_flush;
>> >      bool use_io_thr;
>> > +
>> > +    /*
>> > +     * State used only in the thread "owning" the monitor.
>> > +     * If @use_io_thr, this is mon_global.mon_iothread.
>> > +     * Else, it's the main thread.
>> > +     * These members can be safely accessed without locks.
>> > +     */
>> >      ReadLineState *rs;
>> > +    // other members that aren't shared
>> 
>> Whoops, misunderstanding!  I meant this line as a placeholder, to
>> further illustrate my intent.  It should not be committed.  If we need a
>> comment here, it should use /* traditional comment syntax */.
>
> My fault.
>
> Please let me know if you want me to repost...  Thanks,

Can touch that up, too.  No respin needed unless something more complex
comes up.