From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58146) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Si3EK-0005W8-1X for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 08:44:56 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Si3ED-0006G5-J0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 08:44:51 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:29007) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Si3ED-0006G0-As for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 08:44:45 -0400 From: Juan Quintela In-Reply-To: <20120622024204.GB53903@cs.nctu.edu.tw> (=?utf-8?B?IumZsw==?= =?utf-8?B?6Z+L5Lu7?= (Wei-Ren Chen)"'s message of "Fri, 22 Jun 2012 10:42:04 +0800") References: <189d97ce396dd1b4e8b497fbd1b276086ac05cbc.1337710679.git.quintela@redhat.com> <4FD9CCD7.3030407@redhat.com> <87fw9o4fy1.fsf@elfo.mitica> <20120622024204.GB53903@cs.nctu.edu.tw> Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 14:44:16 +0200 Message-ID: <87bokbectb.fsf@elfo.mitica> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/7] Exit loop if we have been there too long Reply-To: quintela@redhat.com List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "(Wei-Ren Chen)" Cc: Orit Wasserman , chegu_vinod@hp.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org "(Wei-Ren Chen)" wrote: >> >> + if ((i & 63) == 0) { >> >> + uint64_t t1 = (qemu_get_clock_ns(rt_clock) - bwidth) / 1000000; >> >> + if (t1 > 50) { /* 50ms, half buffered_file limit */ >> > can't we use a constant ? >> >> 50 is a constant already, no? Or what do you mean. > > I guess Orit means, > > #define THRESHOLD 50 > > if (t1 > THRESHOLD) { ... } Thanks, Added. Later, Juan.