qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] hw/arm/raspi4b: remove redundant check in raspi_add_memory_node
@ 2025-09-02 20:08 Osama Abdelkader
  2025-09-02 21:08 ` Alex Bennée
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Osama Abdelkader @ 2025-09-02 20:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: peter.maydell, alex.bennee; +Cc: qemu-arm, qemu-devel, Osama Abdelkader

The if (acells == 0 || scells == 0) check is redundant in
raspi_add_memory_node, since it is already checked in the call
chain, arm_load_dtb. Also the return value of the function is
not checked/used so it's removed.

Signed-off-by: Osama Abdelkader <osama.abdelkader@gmail.com>
---
 hw/arm/raspi4b.c | 22 +++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/arm/raspi4b.c b/hw/arm/raspi4b.c
index 20082d5266..4df951a0d8 100644
--- a/hw/arm/raspi4b.c
+++ b/hw/arm/raspi4b.c
@@ -36,9 +36,8 @@ struct Raspi4bMachineState {
  * (see https://datasheets.raspberrypi.com/bcm2711/bcm2711-peripherals.pdf
  * 1.2 Address Map)
  */
-static int raspi_add_memory_node(void *fdt, hwaddr mem_base, hwaddr mem_len)
+static void raspi_add_memory_node(void *fdt, hwaddr mem_base, hwaddr mem_len)
 {
-    int ret;
     uint32_t acells, scells;
     char *nodename = g_strdup_printf("/memory@%" PRIx64, mem_base);
 
@@ -46,19 +45,16 @@ static int raspi_add_memory_node(void *fdt, hwaddr mem_base, hwaddr mem_len)
                                    NULL, &error_fatal);
     scells = qemu_fdt_getprop_cell(fdt, "/", "#size-cells",
                                    NULL, &error_fatal);
-    if (acells == 0 || scells == 0) {
-        fprintf(stderr, "dtb file invalid (#address-cells or #size-cells 0)\n");
-        ret = -1;
-    } else {
-        qemu_fdt_add_subnode(fdt, nodename);
-        qemu_fdt_setprop_string(fdt, nodename, "device_type", "memory");
-        ret = qemu_fdt_setprop_sized_cells(fdt, nodename, "reg",
-                                           acells, mem_base,
-                                           scells, mem_len);
-    }
+    /* validated by arm_load_dtb */
+    g_assert(acells && scells);
+
+    qemu_fdt_add_subnode(fdt, nodename);
+    qemu_fdt_setprop_string(fdt, nodename, "device_type", "memory");
+    qemu_fdt_setprop_sized_cells(fdt, nodename, "reg",
+                                        acells, mem_base,
+                                        scells, mem_len);
 
     g_free(nodename);
-    return ret;
 }
 
 static void raspi4_modify_dtb(const struct arm_boot_info *info, void *fdt)
-- 
2.43.0



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] hw/arm/raspi4b: remove redundant check in raspi_add_memory_node
  2025-09-02 20:08 [PATCH] hw/arm/raspi4b: remove redundant check in raspi_add_memory_node Osama Abdelkader
@ 2025-09-02 21:08 ` Alex Bennée
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Alex Bennée @ 2025-09-02 21:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Osama Abdelkader; +Cc: peter.maydell, qemu-arm, qemu-devel

Osama Abdelkader <osama.abdelkader@gmail.com> writes:

> The if (acells == 0 || scells == 0) check is redundant in
> raspi_add_memory_node, since it is already checked in the call
> chain, arm_load_dtb. Also the return value of the function is
> not checked/used so it's removed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Osama Abdelkader <osama.abdelkader@gmail.com>

Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>

-- 
Alex Bennée
Virtualisation Tech Lead @ Linaro


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2025-09-02 21:09 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-09-02 20:08 [PATCH] hw/arm/raspi4b: remove redundant check in raspi_add_memory_node Osama Abdelkader
2025-09-02 21:08 ` Alex Bennée

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).