From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75622C369DC for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2025 10:05:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1u9hqB-0001ro-Ta; Tue, 29 Apr 2025 06:05:27 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1u9hq7-0001mc-QI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2025 06:05:23 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.129.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1u9hq5-0003Rv-OQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2025 06:05:23 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1745921120; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=y5NLyC1kw2O3SwbJo3iBwg72l0WjQvkHhB9h33OsuH4=; b=Gbwcc/gZFpnFmtuNp12EkeW5hA9T01KRMY1e8IaD20f369oYx+IvMggk8ji/z5fQSVFp0o BIEnD24nYINgeImJbVhvrRbQalHGKZ8I8XXJltBzJvnvFX/iA6JrLYOn2+dt55cED11HBg EKfPdzP/smrdedjIr67+rR4YGwPwDkI= Received: from mx-prod-mc-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-529-fPgnIaV_PFyAjTEEO3J8mg-1; Tue, 29 Apr 2025 06:05:17 -0400 X-MC-Unique: fPgnIaV_PFyAjTEEO3J8mg-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: fPgnIaV_PFyAjTEEO3J8mg_1745921115 Received: from mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.17]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3CE31956088; Tue, 29 Apr 2025 10:05:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (dhcp-192-216.str.redhat.com [10.33.192.216]) by mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7EDE195608D; Tue, 29 Apr 2025 10:05:13 +0000 (UTC) From: Cornelia Huck To: eric.auger@redhat.com, eric.auger.pro@gmail.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-arm@nongnu.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, peter.maydell@linaro.org, richard.henderson@linaro.org, alex.bennee@linaro.org, maz@kernel.org, oliver.upton@linux.dev, sebott@redhat.com, shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com, armbru@redhat.com, berrange@redhat.com, abologna@redhat.com, jdenemar@redhat.com, agraf@csgraf.de Cc: shahuang@redhat.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, philmd@linaro.org, pbonzini@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH for-10.1 v5 00/13] arm: rework id register storage In-Reply-To: <4cbaa46b-2114-49b3-8d59-e92a4967665b@redhat.com> Organization: "Red Hat GmbH, Sitz: Werner-von-Siemens-Ring 12, D-85630 Grasbrunn, Handelsregister: Amtsgericht =?utf-8?Q?M=C3=BCnchen=2C?= HRB 153243, =?utf-8?Q?Gesch=C3=A4ftsf=C3=BChrer=3A?= Ryan Barnhart, Charles Cachera, Michael O'Neill, Amy Ross" References: <20250409144304.912325-1-cohuck@redhat.com> <4cbaa46b-2114-49b3-8d59-e92a4967665b@redhat.com> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.38.3 (https://notmuchmail.org) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 12:05:11 +0200 Message-ID: <87cycvqo4o.fsf@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.17 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.129.124; envelope-from=cohuck@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.484, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org On Mon, Apr 28 2025, Eric Auger wrote: > Hi Connie, > > On 4/9/25 4:42 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote: >> Just a quick respin to fix a missed conversion in hvf.c. >> >> Also available at >> https://gitlab.com/cohuck/qemu/-/commits/arm-rework-idreg-storage-v5 > > I reviewed it again - I can't send any R-b through since I am co-author > ;-) - and I spotted few conversion mistakes (I am most probably the one > to blame here sorry) Oh, I think I'm perfectly capable of messing up on my own :) > > Once those fixed, I think we should be good. Thanks for the review, I fixed things up and did fdarray[2] -> fd for the few cases remaining at the end. Will probably repost after some testing.