From: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
To: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: "Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
"Hyman Huang" <yong.huang@smartx.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Eric Blake" <eblake@redhat.com>,
"Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
"David Hildenbrand" <david@redhat.com>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 10/10] tests/migration-tests: Add test case for responsive CPU throttle
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2024 14:51:49 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87cyl71lxm.fsf@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZuRcgmt2DRPgPdg4@x1n>
Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> writes:
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 12:17:40PM -0300, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
>> Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de> writes:
>>
>> > Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> writes:
>> >
>> >> On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 07:52:48PM -0300, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
>> >>> Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de> writes:
>> >>>
>> >>> > Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> writes:
>> >>> >
>> >>> >> On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 09:13:16AM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> >>> >>> On Wed, 11 Sept 2024 at 22:26, Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de> wrote:
>> >>> >>> > I don't think we're discussing total CI time at this point, so the math
>> >>> >>> > doesn't really add up. We're not looking into making the CI finish
>> >>> >>> > faster. We're looking into making migration-test finish faster. That
>> >>> >>> > would reduce timeouts in CI, speed-up make check and reduce the chance
>> >>> >>> > of random race conditions* affecting other people/staging runs.
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> Right. The reason migration-test appears on my radar is because
>> >>> >>> it is very frequently the thing that shows up as "this sometimes
>> >>> >>> just fails or just times out and if you hit retry it goes away
>> >>> >>> again". That might not be migration-test's fault specifically,
>> >>> >>> because those retries tend to be certain CI configs (s390,
>> >>> >>> the i686-tci one), and I have some theories about what might be
>> >>> >>> causing it (e.g. build system runs 4 migration-tests in parallel,
>> >>> >>> which means 8 QEMU processes which is too many for the number
>> >>> >>> of host CPUs). But right now I look at CI job failures and my reaction
>> >>> >>> is "oh, it's the migration-test failing yet again" :-(
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> For some examples from this week:
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/jobs/7802183144
>> >>> >>> https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/jobs/7799842373 <--------[1]
>> >>> >>> https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/jobs/7786579152 <--------[2]
>> >>> >>> https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/jobs/7786579155
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Ah right, the TIMEOUT is unfortunate, especially if tests can be run in
>> >>> >> parallel. It indeed sounds like no good way to finally solve.. I don't
>> >>> >> also see how speeding up / reducing tests in migration test would help, as
>> >>> >> that's (from some degree..) is the same as tuning the timeout value bigger.
>> >>> >> When the tests are less it'll fit into 480s window, but maybe it's too
>> >>> >> quick now we wonder whether we should shrink it to e.g. 90s, but then it
>> >>> >> can timeout again when on a busy host with less capability of concurrency.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> But indeed there're two ERRORs ([1,2] above).. I collected some more info
>> >>> >> here before the log expires:
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> =================================8<================================
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> *** /i386/migration/multifd/tcp/plain/cancel, qtest-i386 on s390 host
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/jobs/7799842373
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> 101/953 qemu:qtest+qtest-i386 / qtest-i386/migration-test ERROR 144.32s killed by signal 6 SIGABRT
>> >>> >>>>> QTEST_QEMU_STORAGE_DAEMON_BINARY=./storage-daemon/qemu-storage-daemon G_TEST_DBUS_DAEMON=/home/gitlab-runner/builds/zEr9wY_L/0/qemu-project/qemu/tests/dbus-vmstate-daemon.sh PYTHON=/home/gitlab-runner/builds/zEr9wY_L/0/qemu-project/qemu/build/pyvenv/bin/python3 QTEST_QEMU_IMG=./qemu-img MALLOC_PERTURB_=144 QTEST_QEMU_BINARY=./qemu-system-i386 /home/gitlab-runner/builds/zEr9wY_L/0/qemu-project/qemu/build/tests/qtest/migration-test --tap -k
>> >>> >> ――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――― ✀ ―――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――
>> >>> >> stderr:
>> >>> >> warning: fd: migration to a file is deprecated. Use file: instead.
>> >>> >> warning: fd: migration to a file is deprecated. Use file: instead.
>> >>> >> ../tests/qtest/libqtest.c:205: kill_qemu() detected QEMU death from signal 11 (Segmentation fault) (core dumped)
>> >>> >> (test program exited with status code -6)
>> >>> >> TAP parsing error: Too few tests run (expected 53, got 39)
>> >>> >> ――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> # Start of plain tests
>> >>> >> # Running /i386/migration/multifd/tcp/plain/cancel
>> >>> >> # Using machine type: pc-i440fx-9.2
>> >>> >> # starting QEMU: exec ./qemu-system-i386 -qtest unix:/tmp/qtest-3273509.sock -qtest-log /dev/null -chardev socket,path=/tmp/qtest-3273509.qmp,id=char0 -mon chardev=char0,mode=control -display none -audio none -accel kvm -accel tcg -machine pc-i440fx-9.2, -name source,debug-threads=on -m 150M -serial file:/tmp/migration-test-4112T2/src_serial -drive if=none,id=d0,file=/tmp/migration-test-4112T2/bootsect,format=raw -device ide-hd,drive=d0,secs=1,cyls=1,heads=1 2>/dev/null -accel qtest
>> >>> >> # starting QEMU: exec ./qemu-system-i386 -qtest unix:/tmp/qtest-3273509.sock -qtest-log /dev/null -chardev socket,path=/tmp/qtest-3273509.qmp,id=char0 -mon chardev=char0,mode=control -display none -audio none -accel kvm -accel tcg -machine pc-i440fx-9.2, -name target,debug-threads=on -m 150M -serial file:/tmp/migration-test-4112T2/dest_serial -incoming defer -drive if=none,id=d0,file=/tmp/migration-test-4112T2/bootsect,format=raw -device ide-hd,drive=d0,secs=1,cyls=1,heads=1 2>/dev/null -accel qtest
>> >>> >> ----------------------------------- stderr -----------------------------------
>> >>> >> warning: fd: migration to a file is deprecated. Use file: instead.
>> >>> >> warning: fd: migration to a file is deprecated. Use file: instead.
>> >>> >> ../tests/qtest/libqtest.c:205: kill_qemu() detected QEMU death from signal 11 (Segmentation fault) (core dumped)
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> *** /ppc64/migration/multifd/tcp/plain/cancel, qtest-ppc64 on i686 host
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/jobs/7786579152
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> 174/315 qemu:qtest+qtest-ppc64 / qtest-ppc64/migration-test ERROR 381.00s killed by signal 6 SIGABRT
>> >>> >>>>> PYTHON=/builds/qemu-project/qemu/build/pyvenv/bin/python3 QTEST_QEMU_IMG=./qemu-img G_TEST_DBUS_DAEMON=/builds/qemu-project/qemu/tests/dbus-vmstate-daemon.sh QTEST_QEMU_BINARY=./qemu-system-ppc64 MALLOC_PERTURB_=178 QTEST_QEMU_STORAGE_DAEMON_BINARY=./storage-daemon/qemu-storage-daemon /builds/qemu-project/qemu/build/tests/qtest/migration-test --tap -k
>> >>> >> ――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――― ✀ ―――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――
>> >>> >> stderr:
>> >>> >> qemu-system-ppc64: Cannot read from TLS channel: The TLS connection was non-properly terminated.
>> >>> >> warning: fd: migration to a file is deprecated. Use file: instead.
>> >>> >> warning: fd: migration to a file is deprecated. Use file: instead.
>> >>> >> ../tests/qtest/libqtest.c:205: kill_qemu() detected QEMU death from signal 11 (Segmentation fault) (core dumped)
>> >>> >> (test program exited with status code -6)
>> >>> >> TAP parsing error: Too few tests run (expected 61, got 47)
>> >>> >> ――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> # Start of plain tests
>> >>> >> # Running /ppc64/migration/multifd/tcp/plain/cancel
>> >>> >> # Using machine type: pseries-9.2
>> >>> >> # starting QEMU: exec ./qemu-system-ppc64 -qtest unix:/tmp/qtest-40766.sock -qtest-log /dev/null -chardev socket,path=/tmp/qtest-40766.qmp,id=char0 -mon chardev=char0,mode=control -display none -audio none -accel kvm -accel tcg -machine pseries-9.2,vsmt=8 -name source,debug-threads=on -m 256M -serial file:/tmp/migration-test-H0Z1T2/src_serial -nodefaults -machine cap-cfpc=broken,cap-sbbc=broken,cap-ibs=broken,cap-ccf-assist=off, -bios /tmp/migration-test-H0Z1T2/bootsect 2>/dev/null -accel qtest
>> >>> >> # starting QEMU: exec ./qemu-system-ppc64 -qtest unix:/tmp/qtest-40766.sock -qtest-log /dev/null -chardev socket,path=/tmp/qtest-40766.qmp,id=char0 -mon chardev=char0,mode=control -display none -audio none -accel kvm -accel tcg -machine pseries-9.2,vsmt=8 -name target,debug-threads=on -m 256M -serial file:/tmp/migration-test-H0Z1T2/dest_serial -incoming defer -nodefaults -machine cap-cfpc=broken,cap-sbbc=broken,cap-ibs=broken,cap-ccf-assist=off, -bios /tmp/migration-test-H0Z1T2/bootsect 2>/dev/null -accel qtest
>> >>> >> ----------------------------------- stderr -----------------------------------
>> >>> >> qemu-system-ppc64: Cannot read from TLS channel: The TLS connection was non-properly terminated.
>> >>> >> warning: fd: migration to a file is deprecated. Use file: instead.
>> >>> >> warning: fd: migration to a file is deprecated. Use file: instead.
>> >>> >> ../tests/qtest/libqtest.c:205: kill_qemu() detected QEMU death from signal 11 (Segmentation fault) (core dumped)
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> (test program exited with status code -6)
>> >>> >> =================================8<================================
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> So.. it's the same test (multifd/tcp/plain/cancel) that is failing on
>> >>> >> different host / arch being tested. What is more weird is the two failures
>> >>> >> are different, the 2nd failure throw out a TLS error even though the test
>> >>> >> doesn't yet have tls involved.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > I think that's just a parallel test being cancelled prematurely, either
>> >>> > due to the crash or due to the timeout.
>> >>> >
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Fabiano, is this the issue you're looking at?
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Yes. I can reproduce locally by running 2 processes in parallel: 1 loop
>> >>> > with make -j$(nproc) check and another loop with tcp/plain/cancel. It
>> >>> > takes ~1h to hit. I've seen crashes with ppc64, s390 and
>> >>> > aarch64.
>> >>> >
>> >>>
>> >>> Ok, the issue is that after commit 5ef7e26bdb ("migration/multifd: solve
>> >>> zero page causing multiple page faults"), the multifd code started using
>> >>> the rb->receivedmap bitmap, which belongs to the ram code and is
>> >>> initialized and *freed* from the ram SaveVMHandlers.
>> >>>
>> >>> process_incoming_migration_co() ...
>> >>> qemu_loadvm_state() multifd_nocomp_recv()
>> >>> qemu_loadvm_state_cleanup() ramblock_recv_bitmap_set_offset()
>> >>> rb->receivedmap = NULL set_bit_atomic(..., rb->receivedmap)
>> >>> ...
>> >>> migration_incoming_state_destroy()
>> >>> multifd_recv_cleanup()
>> >>> multifd_recv_terminate_threads(NULL)
>> >>>
>> >>> Multifd threads are live until migration_incoming_state_destroy(), which
>> >>> is called some time later.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks for the debugging. Hmm I would expect loadvm should wait until all
>> >> ram is received somehow..
>> >
>> > Looks like a similar issue as when we didn't have the multifd_send sync
>> > working correctly and ram code would run and do cleanup.
>>
>> Btw, this is hard to debug, but I bet what's happening is that the
>> ram_load code itself is exiting due to qemufile error. So there wouldn't
>> be a way to make it wait for multifd.
>
> One more thing is I remember one of the error is not the crash but some TLS
> disconnection error. I wonder which one you can reproduce and why that TLS
> code can got kicked off in the multifd cancel test. Perhaps the memory was
> simply corrupted around, so bitmap ops can write to some other memory?
I haven't seen that error. I said in another email that I think that is
due to the timeout cancelling the tests forcefully.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-13 17:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-09 13:47 [PATCH RFC 00/10] migration: auto-converge refinements for huge VM Hyman Huang
2024-09-09 13:47 ` [PATCH RFC 01/10] migration: Introduce structs for periodic CPU throttle Hyman Huang
2024-09-09 13:47 ` [PATCH RFC 02/10] migration: Refine util functions to support " Hyman Huang
2024-09-09 13:47 ` [PATCH RFC 03/10] qapi/migration: Introduce periodic CPU throttling parameters Hyman Huang
2024-09-09 13:47 ` [PATCH RFC 04/10] qapi/migration: Introduce the iteration-count Hyman Huang
2024-09-09 13:47 ` [PATCH RFC 05/10] migration: Introduce util functions for periodic CPU throttle Hyman Huang
2024-09-09 13:47 ` [PATCH RFC 06/10] migration: Support " Hyman Huang
2024-09-09 13:47 ` [PATCH RFC 07/10] tests/migration-tests: Add test case for periodic throttle Hyman Huang
2024-09-09 13:47 ` [PATCH RFC 08/10] migration: Introduce cpu-responsive-throttle parameter Hyman Huang
2024-09-09 13:47 ` [PATCH RFC 09/10] migration: Support responsive CPU throttle Hyman Huang
2024-09-09 13:47 ` [PATCH RFC 10/10] tests/migration-tests: Add test case for " Hyman Huang
2024-09-09 14:02 ` Peter Maydell
2024-09-09 14:36 ` Peter Xu
2024-09-09 21:54 ` Fabiano Rosas
2024-09-10 21:22 ` Peter Xu
2024-09-10 22:23 ` Fabiano Rosas
2024-09-11 15:59 ` Peter Xu
2024-09-11 19:48 ` Fabiano Rosas
2024-09-11 20:37 ` Peter Xu
2024-09-11 21:26 ` Fabiano Rosas
2024-09-12 8:13 ` Peter Maydell
2024-09-12 13:48 ` Fabiano Rosas
2024-09-12 14:09 ` Peter Maydell
2024-09-12 14:28 ` Fabiano Rosas
2024-09-12 15:09 ` Peter Xu
2024-09-12 15:14 ` Peter Maydell
2024-09-13 15:02 ` Peter Xu
2024-09-12 15:37 ` Fabiano Rosas
2024-09-12 22:52 ` Fabiano Rosas
2024-09-13 15:00 ` Peter Xu
2024-09-13 15:09 ` Fabiano Rosas
2024-09-13 15:17 ` Fabiano Rosas
2024-09-13 15:38 ` Peter Xu
2024-09-13 17:51 ` Fabiano Rosas [this message]
2024-09-09 14:43 ` Yong Huang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87cyl71lxm.fsf@suse.de \
--to=farosas@suse.de \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=yong.huang@smartx.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).