From: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
Cc: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Anton Kuchin <antonkuchin@yandex-team.ru>,
qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"open list:virtiofs" <virtio-fs@redhat.com>,
Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>,
yc-core@yandex-team.ru
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vhost-user-fs: add capability to allow migration
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2023 15:37:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87cz6te9k9.fsf@secure.mitica> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJSP0QUANuLkOjkLsB4LqKdi5_sJj+y6zK5vgcNmYZ5BLQ73rQ@mail.gmail.com> (Stefan Hajnoczi's message of "Tue, 24 Jan 2023 07:48:12 -0500")
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2023, 04:50 Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
> wrote:
[...]
>> > I checked how bad the situation is. libvhost-user currently enables
>> > LOG_ALL by default. :(
>> >
>> > So I don't think the front-end can use LOG_ALL alone to determine
>> > whether or not migration is supported by the back-end.
>> >
>> > There are several existing back-ends based on libvhost-user that have
>> > no concept of reconnection or migration but report the LOG_ALL feature
>> > bit.
>>
>> Ouch, yes that's messy.
>>
>> Going back to the original question; I don't think a command line flag
>> will work though, because even for a given VM there's the possibility
>> of some (local) migrations working but other (remote) migrations not
>> working; so you don't know at the point you start the VM whether
>> your migrations are going to work.
>>
>
> The user or management tool should know which types of migration a
> vhost-user-fs backend supports. That can be passed in as a per-device
> parameter.
>
> Then a migration parameter can be used to distinguish between same host and
> remote host migration? QEMU already distinguishes between pre-copy and
> post-copy migration, so this can be thought of as yet another type of
> migration.
I was going to suggest this (my previous answer was after reading only
the other part of the comments).
What we have here is that this device has "three" states:
- You can't migrate it to other host (now and the default behaviour)
- You can migrate some of the backends if you are migrating in the same
host (note, we don't know directly that we are migrating inside the
same host, so I would agree to add _that_ migration capability, that
is related to migration, and it makes sense for migration code and
devices to know that is happening)
- In the future, perhaps, you can migrate "always" some vhost-use-fs,
that would be a property on my opinion.
Later, Juan.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-01 14:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-15 17:09 [PATCH] vhost-user-fs: add capability to allow migration Anton Kuchin
2023-01-18 15:52 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-01-19 12:43 ` Anton Kuchin
2023-01-19 14:30 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-01-19 15:29 ` Anton Kuchin
2023-01-19 16:02 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-01-19 16:58 ` Anton Kuchin
2023-01-19 20:40 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-02-01 14:26 ` Juan Quintela
2023-02-02 0:54 ` Anton Kuchin
2023-02-02 9:59 ` Juan Quintela
2023-02-10 14:09 ` Anton Kuchin
2023-02-10 16:08 ` Juan Quintela
2023-02-16 21:00 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-01-19 12:51 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-01-19 13:45 ` Anton Kuchin
2023-01-19 19:00 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2023-01-19 20:47 ` Anton Kuchin
2023-01-20 13:58 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-01-20 17:37 ` Anton Kuchin
2023-01-22 8:16 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-01-22 12:36 ` Anton Kuchin
2023-01-22 14:46 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-01-22 16:09 ` Anton Kuchin
2023-01-22 16:17 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-01-23 14:09 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-01-23 15:52 ` Anton Kuchin
2023-01-23 19:49 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-01-23 21:00 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-01-23 21:56 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-01-23 18:27 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2023-01-23 19:53 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-01-24 1:46 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-01-24 9:50 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2023-01-24 12:48 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-02-01 14:37 ` Juan Quintela [this message]
2023-01-25 19:46 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-01-26 14:20 ` Anton Kuchin
2023-01-26 15:13 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-01-26 15:21 ` Anton Kuchin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87cz6te9k9.fsf@secure.mitica \
--to=quintela@redhat.com \
--cc=antonkuchin@yandex-team.ru \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=virtio-fs@redhat.com \
--cc=yc-core@yandex-team.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).