From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39608) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dXNwB-0005pd-PU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 04:33:00 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dXNw6-0001Y9-Tz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 04:32:59 -0400 Received: from mail-wr0-x232.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c0c::232]:33731) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dXNw6-0001Xl-Mp for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 04:32:54 -0400 Received: by mail-wr0-x232.google.com with SMTP id a10so18419400wrd.0 for ; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 01:32:54 -0700 (PDT) References: <20170717144848.11793-1-alex.bennee@linaro.org> <20170717230025.GD2585@lemon> From: Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?= In-reply-to: <20170717230025.GD2585@lemon> Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 09:32:51 +0100 Message-ID: <87d18y87rg.fsf@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 00/23] Current Travis Queue List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Fam Zheng Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Fam Zheng writes: > On Mon, 07/17 15:48, Alex Bennée wrote: >> Hi, >> >> This is the current status of the travis/next patch queue. The >> includes updates from Paolo to allow parallelism while testing in the >> docker environment. I've extended the travis image so we can actually >> run our travis.py script in the Travis image. >> >> There are also a number of updates from Phillipe which add a bunch of >> additional cross compile targets to our shippable setup. The cachinfo >> patch is temporary and won't make the pull as it is already queued in >> Richard's tcg-next. >> >> I'm currently trying to catch one of our Travis hangs in the act >> (postcopy-test) but it seems to be very much a heavy load race >> condition which annoyingly stops happening once you try and get >> debugging tools on it. This is the reason I've updated the travis >> docker image to include the debug tools ;-) >> >> As long as there are no screams of outrage I'll roll a pullreq for >> softfreeze tomorrow. > > Renaming of debian to debian9 seems backward incompatible. We don't care that > much, but I'd like to see a commit message justifying the change. Otherwise it > looks good to go (minus the cachinfo patch, of course). Well originally we were basing off debian-stable but we got caught out by the new release. With this series we have most things off the latest stable (Debian 9 - aka Stretch) but one or two builds are based of old stable (Debian 8 - aka Jessie) and using the embedian hacks we had before. I think for this it's mostly a matter of clarity. -- Alex Bennée