From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48368)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <quintela@redhat.com>) id 1SQGnk-0006Ck-Fo
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 May 2012 07:35:57 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <quintela@redhat.com>) id 1SQGne-0003Vb-A0
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 May 2012 07:35:56 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:22560)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <quintela@redhat.com>) id 1SQGne-0003VS-23
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 May 2012 07:35:50 -0400
From: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <87havwb2o2.fsf@elfo.elfo> (Juan Quintela's message of "Fri, 04
	May 2012 13:34:21 +0200")
References: <cover.1336128412.git.quintela@redhat.com>
	<4FA3BB59.3040402@suse.de> <87havwb2o2.fsf@elfo.elfo>
Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 13:35:46 +0200
Message-ID: <87d36kb2lp.fsf@elfo.elfo>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 00/35] VMState port of all cpus
Reply-To: quintela@redhat.com
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Andreas =?utf-8?Q?F=C3=A4rber?= <afaerber@suse.de>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>

Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com> wrote:
> Andreas F=C3=A4rber <afaerber@suse.de> wrote:
>> Am 04.05.2012 12:54, schrieb Juan Quintela:
>>> This repository contains all the changes:
>>>=20
>>>   git://repo.or.cz/qemu/quintela.git vmstate-cpus-v4
>>>=20

Oops, you meaned here.  s/v4/v5/  :-(

I have to put in one script how to ask for a pull and don't rely on my
weak memory.


>>> [v5]
>>> - rebase on top
>>> - sparc psr change behaviour: old behaviour was unintended, thanks Blu
>>> - alexander agreed with ppc changes
>>> - patch missing already included for ppc
>>>=20
>>> Anthony, please pull.
>>
>> You forgot to update the subjects. And if it's labeled [PATCH] it's
>> supposed to be reviewed, not directly pulled.
>
> Oops.  I think that I answered all the review comments on previous
> threads, Should be ready for pull.
>
>
>> The branch is off by one; positive that -v4 branch matches v5 series?
>
> Shuould be updated by now  (I sent the patches and forget to do the
> push).