From: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
To: Bernhard Beschow <shentey@gmail.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Sunil Muthuswamy" <sunilmut@microsoft.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Marcel Apfelbaum" <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,
"Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
qemu-trivial@nongnu.org,
"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
"Juan Quintela" <quintela@redhat.com>,
"Eduardo Habkost" <eduardo@habkost.net>,
"Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>,
"Igor Mammedov" <imammedo@redhat.com>,
"BALATON Zoltan" <balaton@eik.bme.hu>,
"Ani Sinha" <ani@anisinha.ca>,
"Laurent Vivier" <lvivier@redhat.com>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/9] hw/i386/pc: Initialize ram_memory variable directly
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2023 10:38:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87e11e16-f9ad-bfb4-cc1c-d5288741ded3@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230213162004.2797-7-shentey@gmail.com>
On 2/14/2023 12:20 AM, Bernhard Beschow wrote:
> Going through pc_memory_init() seems quite complicated for a simple
> assignment.
>
...
> diff --git a/hw/i386/pc_piix.c b/hw/i386/pc_piix.c
> index 5bde4533cc..00ba725656 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/pc_piix.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/pc_piix.c
> @@ -143,6 +143,7 @@ static void pc_init1(MachineState *machine,
> if (xen_enabled()) {
> xen_hvm_init_pc(pcms, &ram_memory);
> } else {
> + ram_memory = machine->ram;
> if (!pcms->max_ram_below_4g) {
> pcms->max_ram_below_4g = 0xe0000000; /* default: 3.5G */
> }
> @@ -205,8 +206,7 @@ static void pc_init1(MachineState *machine,
>
> /* allocate ram and load rom/bios */
> if (!xen_enabled()) {
> - pc_memory_init(pcms, system_memory,
> - rom_memory, &ram_memory, hole64_size);
IMHO, it seems more proper to put
+ ram_memory = machine->ram;
here rather than above.
> + pc_memory_init(pcms, system_memory, rom_memory, hole64_size);
> } else {
> pc_system_flash_cleanup_unused(pcms);
> if (machine->kernel_filename != NULL) {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-22 2:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-13 16:19 [PATCH v4 0/9] PC cleanups Bernhard Beschow
2023-02-13 16:19 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] hw/pci-host/i440fx: Inline sysbus_add_io() Bernhard Beschow
2023-02-22 10:58 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-02-22 18:05 ` Bernhard Beschow
2023-03-06 6:57 ` Bernhard Beschow
2023-03-07 22:32 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-02-13 16:19 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] hw/pci-host/q35: " Bernhard Beschow
2023-02-13 16:19 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] hw/i386/pc_q35: Reuse machine parameter Bernhard Beschow
2023-02-22 11:03 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-02-22 17:52 ` Bernhard Beschow
2023-02-22 20:24 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-02-13 16:19 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] hw/i386/pc_{q35, piix}: Reuse MachineClass::desc as SMB product name Bernhard Beschow
2023-02-13 16:20 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] hw/i386/pc_{q35, piix}: Minimize usage of get_system_memory() Bernhard Beschow
2023-02-22 11:05 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-02-13 16:20 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] hw/i386/pc: Initialize ram_memory variable directly Bernhard Beschow
2023-02-22 2:38 ` Xiaoyao Li [this message]
2023-02-22 8:21 ` Bernhard Beschow
2023-02-13 16:20 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] hw/pci-host/pam: Make init_pam() usage more readable Bernhard Beschow
2023-02-13 16:20 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] hw/i386/x86: Make TYPE_X86_MACHINE the owner of smram Bernhard Beschow
2023-02-13 16:20 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] target/i386/tcg/sysemu/tcg-cpu: Avoid own opinion about smram size Bernhard Beschow
2023-02-13 16:45 ` [PATCH v4 0/9] PC cleanups Bernhard Beschow
2023-03-05 7:45 ` Bernhard Beschow
2023-03-05 10:09 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-03-07 22:34 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-05-10 18:26 ` Bernhard Beschow
2023-05-10 19:20 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-05-10 21:19 ` Bernhard Beschow
2023-02-21 15:40 ` Bernhard Beschow
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87e11e16-f9ad-bfb4-cc1c-d5288741ded3@intel.com \
--to=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
--cc=ani@anisinha.ca \
--cc=balaton@eik.bme.hu \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-trivial@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=shentey@gmail.com \
--cc=sunilmut@microsoft.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).