From: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
To: "Cédric Le Goater" <clg@redhat.com>
Cc: "Peter Xu" <peterx@redhat.com>,
"Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, farosas@suse.de, peter.maydell@linaro.org
Subject: Re: g_autoptr(Error)
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2025 12:46:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ecplc8yn.fsf@pond.sub.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c0aa79ad-d6f4-413f-ade6-43e7609e37ac@redhat.com> ("Cédric Le Goater"'s message of "Wed, 26 Nov 2025 11:26:20 +0100")
Cédric Le Goater <clg@redhat.com> writes:
> On 11/26/25 09:19, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>> On 11/25/25 17:15, Peter Xu wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 25, 2025 at 12:46:01PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
[...]
On the review and merging of commit 18eb55546a5 (error: define
g_autoptr() cleanup function for the Error type):
>>>> I missed it. Not he submitter's fault; it was cc'ed to me.
>>>
>>> If someone to blame, it's the reviewer.
>> At end, I was the one who merged this stuff. My bad.
>>
>> I felt confident at the time, as it was only a single-line change reviewed
>> by a subsystem maintainer and the patch was large enough that this didn't
>
> s/patch/series/ makes more sense.
>
> Sorry for the noise.
> C.
>
>
>> raise my attention.
>>
>> But it should have been treated with greater caution, global features must
>> be introduced together with concrete usage proposals. I think this would
>> have raised some unconscious red flags.
>> Thanks,
>> C.
Don't worry about it! From my point of view, the process worked okay.
A big series got reviewed by maintainers, except for one little patch
touching another subsystem, where that subsystem's maintainer (me)
remained silent. The series was then merged without further delay.
Would I have appreciate a timely nudge on that little patch? Sure. Is
not nudging me a failure of sorts? Nope.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-26 11:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-25 7:05 [PATCH] migration: Fix double-free on error path Markus Armbruster
2025-11-25 7:11 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-11-25 15:41 ` Peter Xu
2025-11-25 7:12 ` Marc-André Lureau
2025-11-25 12:59 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-11-25 15:47 ` Peter Xu
2025-11-25 18:48 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-11-25 19:32 ` Peter Xu
2025-11-26 6:12 ` Should functions that free memory clear the pointer? (was: [PATCH] migration: Fix double-free on error path) Markus Armbruster
2025-11-26 8:21 ` Should functions that free memory clear the pointer? Cédric Le Goater
2025-11-25 7:16 ` [PATCH] migration: Fix double-free on error path Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-11-25 7:40 ` g_autoptr(Error) (was: [PATCH] migration: Fix double-free on error path) Markus Armbruster
2025-11-25 11:25 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-11-25 11:46 ` g_autoptr(Error) Markus Armbruster
2025-11-25 16:15 ` g_autoptr(Error) Peter Xu
2025-11-25 19:02 ` g_autoptr(Error) Markus Armbruster
2025-11-25 20:49 ` g_autoptr(Error) Peter Xu
2025-11-26 8:19 ` g_autoptr(Error) Cédric Le Goater
2025-11-26 10:26 ` g_autoptr(Error) Cédric Le Goater
2025-11-26 11:46 ` Markus Armbruster [this message]
2025-11-26 12:00 ` g_autoptr(Error) Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-11-26 12:41 ` g_autoptr(Error) Markus Armbruster
2025-11-26 13:27 ` g_autoptr(Error) Peter Maydell
2025-11-26 14:01 ` g_autoptr(Error) Markus Armbruster
2025-12-02 8:34 ` [PATCH] migration: Fix double-free on error path Markus Armbruster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ecplc8yn.fsf@pond.sub.org \
--to=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=clg@redhat.com \
--cc=farosas@suse.de \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).