qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: "Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
	"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <f4bug@amsat.org>,
	"Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>,
	"QEMU Developers" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	"Cleber Rosa" <crosa@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: "make check-acceptance" takes way too long
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 18:14:34 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ee44c7mp.fsf@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA9cMZoj18gq7Ksv5PRoU1wRmXvW_e9UE73C_MEB7wTroQ@mail.gmail.com>


Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> writes:

> "make check-acceptance" takes way way too long. I just did a run
> on an arm-and-aarch64-targets-only debug build and it took over
> half an hour, and this despite it skipping or cancelling 26 out
> of 58 tests!
>
> I think that ~10 minutes runtime is reasonable. 30 is not;
> ideally no individual test would take more than a minute or so.
>
> Output saying where the time went. The first two tests take
> more than 10 minutes *each*. I think a good start would be to find
> a way of testing what they're testing that is less heavyweight.
>
>  (01/58) tests/acceptance/boot_linux.py:BootLinuxAarch64.test_virt_tcg_gicv2:
> PASS (629.74 s)
>  (02/58) tests/acceptance/boot_linux.py:BootLinuxAarch64.test_virt_tcg_gicv3:
> PASS (628.75 s)

So I've done some digging and tried some alternative images but I'm
running into two things:

 - -cpu max is slow without ,pauth-impdef=on
 - for some reason the distro cloud images cause 2 orders of magnitude more TB
   invalidates

For example a very simple Alpine boot:

  Translation buffer state:
  gen code size       810926227/1073659904
  TB count            1514678
  TB avg target size  17 max=2048 bytes
  TB avg host size    292 bytes (expansion ratio: 16.8)
  cross page TB count 0 (0%)
  direct jump count   1035828 (68%) (2 jumps=772419 50%)
  TB hash buckets     439751/524288 (83.88% head buckets used)
  TB hash occupancy   42.96% avg chain occ. Histogram: [0,10)%|▄▁█▁▁▇▁▅▁▂|[90,100]%
  TB hash avg chain   1.056 buckets. Histogram: 1|█▁  ▁▁|10

  Statistics:
  TB flush count      0
  TB invalidate count 550632
  TLB full flushes    0
  TLB partial flushes 1488833
  TLB elided flushes  12085180
  [TCG profiler not compiled]

which unsurprisingly has this at the top of the perf profile:

  20.17%  qemu-system-aar  qemu-system-aarch64      [.] do_tb_phys_invalidate   
   3.60%  qemu-system-aar  qemu-system-aarch64      [.] helper_lookup_tb_ptr
   
Versus my Debian Bullseye testing image (with all of systemd):

  Translation buffer state:
  gen code size       899208739/1073577984
  TB count            1599725
  TB avg target size  18 max=2048 bytes
  TB avg host size    318 bytes (expansion ratio: 17.2)
  cross page TB count 0 (0%)
  direct jump count   1067312 (66%) (2 jumps=826284 51%)
  TB hash buckets     816402/1048576 (77.86% head buckets used)
  TB hash occupancy   36.57% avg chain occ. Histogram: [0,10)%|▅ █  ▆▁▃▁▂|[90,100]%
  TB hash avg chain   1.027 buckets. Histogram: 1|█▁▁  ▁|9

  Statistics:
  TB flush count      0
  TB invalidate count 7763
  TLB full flushes    0
  TLB partial flushes 1066791
  TLB elided flushes  973569
  [TCG profiler not compiled]

with a more reasonable balance:

   4.21%  qemu-system-aar  qemu-system-aarch64         [.] get_phys_addr_lpae
   4.16%  qemu-system-aar  qemu-system-aarch64         [.] helper_lookup_tb_ptr

I'm open to ideas as to what might cause that.

-- 
Alex Bennée


      parent reply	other threads:[~2022-02-15 18:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-30 15:12 "make check-acceptance" takes way too long Peter Maydell
2021-07-30 15:41 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-07-30 15:42 ` Peter Maydell
2021-07-30 22:04   ` Cleber Rosa
2021-07-31  6:39     ` Thomas Huth
2021-07-31 17:58       ` Cleber Rosa
2021-07-31 18:41 ` Alex Bennée
2021-07-31 20:32   ` Peter Maydell
2021-08-02 22:55     ` Cleber Rosa
2021-08-02  8:38 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-08-02 12:47   ` Alex Bennée
2021-08-02 12:59     ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-08-02 12:55   ` Alex Bennée
2021-08-02 13:00     ` Peter Maydell
2021-08-02 13:04       ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-08-02 13:25         ` Thomas Huth
2021-08-02 13:00     ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-08-02 13:27       ` Thomas Huth
2021-08-02 13:43         ` Gerd Hoffmann
2022-01-20 15:13 ` Peter Maydell
2022-01-20 15:35   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé via
2022-01-21  7:56   ` Thomas Huth
2022-01-21 10:50     ` Markus Armbruster
2022-01-21 11:33       ` Peter Maydell
2022-01-21 12:23         ` Alex Bennée
2022-01-21 12:41           ` Thomas Huth
2022-01-21 15:21           ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-01-25  9:20             ` Gerd Hoffmann
2022-02-01  6:31               ` Stefano Brivio
2022-02-01  7:49                 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2022-02-01  9:06                 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-02-01 10:27                   ` Stefano Brivio
2022-02-01 11:17                     ` Alex Bennée
2022-02-01 16:01                       ` Cleber Rosa
2022-02-01 16:19                         ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-02-01 17:47                           ` Cleber Rosa
2022-02-01 18:03                             ` Alex Bennée
2022-02-01 19:04                               ` Cleber Rosa
2022-02-01 18:35                             ` Stefano Brivio
2022-02-01 17:59                         ` Cédric Le Goater
2022-02-01 11:06               ` Kashyap Chamarthy
2022-02-01 15:54                 ` Cleber Rosa
2022-02-01  5:29             ` Cleber Rosa
2022-02-01 17:01               ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-02-01 17:59                 ` Cleber Rosa
2022-02-15 18:14 ` Alex Bennée [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87ee44c7mp.fsf@linaro.org \
    --to=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=crosa@redhat.com \
    --cc=f4bug@amsat.org \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).