From: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: "Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <f4bug@amsat.org>,
"Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>,
"QEMU Developers" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"Cleber Rosa" <crosa@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: "make check-acceptance" takes way too long
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 18:14:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ee44c7mp.fsf@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA9cMZoj18gq7Ksv5PRoU1wRmXvW_e9UE73C_MEB7wTroQ@mail.gmail.com>
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> writes:
> "make check-acceptance" takes way way too long. I just did a run
> on an arm-and-aarch64-targets-only debug build and it took over
> half an hour, and this despite it skipping or cancelling 26 out
> of 58 tests!
>
> I think that ~10 minutes runtime is reasonable. 30 is not;
> ideally no individual test would take more than a minute or so.
>
> Output saying where the time went. The first two tests take
> more than 10 minutes *each*. I think a good start would be to find
> a way of testing what they're testing that is less heavyweight.
>
> (01/58) tests/acceptance/boot_linux.py:BootLinuxAarch64.test_virt_tcg_gicv2:
> PASS (629.74 s)
> (02/58) tests/acceptance/boot_linux.py:BootLinuxAarch64.test_virt_tcg_gicv3:
> PASS (628.75 s)
So I've done some digging and tried some alternative images but I'm
running into two things:
- -cpu max is slow without ,pauth-impdef=on
- for some reason the distro cloud images cause 2 orders of magnitude more TB
invalidates
For example a very simple Alpine boot:
Translation buffer state:
gen code size 810926227/1073659904
TB count 1514678
TB avg target size 17 max=2048 bytes
TB avg host size 292 bytes (expansion ratio: 16.8)
cross page TB count 0 (0%)
direct jump count 1035828 (68%) (2 jumps=772419 50%)
TB hash buckets 439751/524288 (83.88% head buckets used)
TB hash occupancy 42.96% avg chain occ. Histogram: [0,10)%|▄▁█▁▁▇▁▅▁▂|[90,100]%
TB hash avg chain 1.056 buckets. Histogram: 1|█▁ ▁▁|10
Statistics:
TB flush count 0
TB invalidate count 550632
TLB full flushes 0
TLB partial flushes 1488833
TLB elided flushes 12085180
[TCG profiler not compiled]
which unsurprisingly has this at the top of the perf profile:
20.17% qemu-system-aar qemu-system-aarch64 [.] do_tb_phys_invalidate
3.60% qemu-system-aar qemu-system-aarch64 [.] helper_lookup_tb_ptr
Versus my Debian Bullseye testing image (with all of systemd):
Translation buffer state:
gen code size 899208739/1073577984
TB count 1599725
TB avg target size 18 max=2048 bytes
TB avg host size 318 bytes (expansion ratio: 17.2)
cross page TB count 0 (0%)
direct jump count 1067312 (66%) (2 jumps=826284 51%)
TB hash buckets 816402/1048576 (77.86% head buckets used)
TB hash occupancy 36.57% avg chain occ. Histogram: [0,10)%|▅ █ ▆▁▃▁▂|[90,100]%
TB hash avg chain 1.027 buckets. Histogram: 1|█▁▁ ▁|9
Statistics:
TB flush count 0
TB invalidate count 7763
TLB full flushes 0
TLB partial flushes 1066791
TLB elided flushes 973569
[TCG profiler not compiled]
with a more reasonable balance:
4.21% qemu-system-aar qemu-system-aarch64 [.] get_phys_addr_lpae
4.16% qemu-system-aar qemu-system-aarch64 [.] helper_lookup_tb_ptr
I'm open to ideas as to what might cause that.
--
Alex Bennée
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-15 18:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-30 15:12 "make check-acceptance" takes way too long Peter Maydell
2021-07-30 15:41 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-07-30 15:42 ` Peter Maydell
2021-07-30 22:04 ` Cleber Rosa
2021-07-31 6:39 ` Thomas Huth
2021-07-31 17:58 ` Cleber Rosa
2021-07-31 18:41 ` Alex Bennée
2021-07-31 20:32 ` Peter Maydell
2021-08-02 22:55 ` Cleber Rosa
2021-08-02 8:38 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-08-02 12:47 ` Alex Bennée
2021-08-02 12:59 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-08-02 12:55 ` Alex Bennée
2021-08-02 13:00 ` Peter Maydell
2021-08-02 13:04 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-08-02 13:25 ` Thomas Huth
2021-08-02 13:00 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-08-02 13:27 ` Thomas Huth
2021-08-02 13:43 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2022-01-20 15:13 ` Peter Maydell
2022-01-20 15:35 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé via
2022-01-21 7:56 ` Thomas Huth
2022-01-21 10:50 ` Markus Armbruster
2022-01-21 11:33 ` Peter Maydell
2022-01-21 12:23 ` Alex Bennée
2022-01-21 12:41 ` Thomas Huth
2022-01-21 15:21 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-01-25 9:20 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2022-02-01 6:31 ` Stefano Brivio
2022-02-01 7:49 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2022-02-01 9:06 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-02-01 10:27 ` Stefano Brivio
2022-02-01 11:17 ` Alex Bennée
2022-02-01 16:01 ` Cleber Rosa
2022-02-01 16:19 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-02-01 17:47 ` Cleber Rosa
2022-02-01 18:03 ` Alex Bennée
2022-02-01 19:04 ` Cleber Rosa
2022-02-01 18:35 ` Stefano Brivio
2022-02-01 17:59 ` Cédric Le Goater
2022-02-01 11:06 ` Kashyap Chamarthy
2022-02-01 15:54 ` Cleber Rosa
2022-02-01 5:29 ` Cleber Rosa
2022-02-01 17:01 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-02-01 17:59 ` Cleber Rosa
2022-02-15 18:14 ` Alex Bennée [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ee44c7mp.fsf@linaro.org \
--to=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=crosa@redhat.com \
--cc=f4bug@amsat.org \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).