From: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
To: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Beniamino Galvani <b.galvani@gmail.com>,
qemu-arm@nongnu.org, Antony Pavlov <antonynpavlov@gmail.com>,
"Edgar E . Iglesias" <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com>,
Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@xilinx.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] arm: remove remaining cannot_destroy_with_object_finalize_yet
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 09:06:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87efwwrdki.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170412173203.20072-1-lvivier@redhat.com> (Laurent Vivier's message of "Wed, 12 Apr 2017 19:32:03 +0200")
Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com> writes:
> With commit ce5b1bbf624b ("exec: move cpu_exec_init() calls to
> realize functions"), we can now remove all the
> remaining cannot_destroy_with_object_finalize_yet as
> unsafe references have been moved to cpu_exec_realizefn().
> (tested with QOM command provided by commit 4c315c27).
Also tested with device-introspect-test :)
> Suggested-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
Thanks, Laurent!
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Just three places marking broken devices left: versatile.c
("realview_pci" and "versatile_pci"), target/ppc/kvm.c (various ppc
CPUs). Volunteers to fix them, so we can get rid of
cannot_destroy_with_object_finalize_yet?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-13 7:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-12 17:32 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] arm: remove remaining cannot_destroy_with_object_finalize_yet Laurent Vivier
2017-04-13 7:06 ` Markus Armbruster [this message]
2017-04-13 8:18 ` Laurent Vivier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87efwwrdki.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org \
--to=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=alistair.francis@xilinx.com \
--cc=antonynpavlov@gmail.com \
--cc=b.galvani@gmail.com \
--cc=edgar.iglesias@gmail.com \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).