From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33696)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <aliguori@us.ibm.com>) id 1Uwg3M-000143-CA
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 18:06:33 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <aliguori@us.ibm.com>) id 1Uwg3L-0005cS-GT
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 18:06:32 -0400
Received: from e7.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.137]:60871)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <aliguori@us.ibm.com>) id 1Uwg3L-0005cI-Bb
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 18:06:31 -0400
Received: from /spool/local
	by e7.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only!
	Violators will be prosecuted
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org> from <aliguori@us.ibm.com>;
	Tue, 9 Jul 2013 18:06:30 -0400
Received: from d01relay06.pok.ibm.com (d01relay06.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.116])
	by d01dlp03.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A01BEC9003E
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Tue,  9 Jul 2013 18:06:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (d03av03.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.169])
	by d01relay06.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id
	r69M6RaG66191490
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 18:06:27 -0400
Received: from d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1])
	by d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP
	id r69M5ReR028888
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 16:05:27 -0600
From: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <20130709212405.GA2316@amt.cnet>
References: <20121212213631.GA27694@amt.cnet> <51384EED.5020709@redhat.com>
	<20130308171151.GA29630@amt.cnet>
	<87r4jpvkv1.fsf@codemonkey.ws> <513ACC44.5090805@redhat.com>
	<20130709212405.GA2316@amt.cnet>
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 17:05:24 -0500
Message-ID: <87ehb7bd97.fsf@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] RTC: enable lost_tick_policy=slew as
	default (v2)
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> writes:

> On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 06:44:36AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Il 08/03/2013 18:53, Anthony Liguori ha scritto:
>> >> Anthony mentioned that this
>> >>
>> >> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/160699
>> >>
>> >> Is the proper way to do it.
>> > 
>> > That breaks too.  I don't have a solution but I also don't remember what
>> > the exact failures are.
>> 
>> What about a more generic version of that?  Adding a priority field to
>> global properties, so that -global can have a higher priority than the
>> default (used by machine types)?
>> 
>> Paolo
>
> What exactly is the problem with
>
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2012-12/msg01733.html
>
> Again? Should it just be resubmitted ?

Breaks the -rtc option which also uses globals.

Try qemu -M pc-1.4 -rtc driftfix=slew

Or qemu -M pc-1.4 -rtc-td-hack

Regards,

Anthony Liguori