From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MP4dh-00054p-Dh
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 21:11:01 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MP4dd-00052D-0Y
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 21:11:00 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=56059 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MP4dc-00051l-Ov
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 21:10:56 -0400
Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:53353)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <armbru@redhat.com>) id 1MP4dc-0003Sh-BK
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 21:10:56 -0400
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Planning for the 0.11.0 release
References: <4A401A65.3080804@us.ibm.com> <1247128021.22231.1.camel@blaa>
	<4A55F150.3020803@codemonkey.ws>
From: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 03:10:49 +0200
In-Reply-To: <4A55F150.3020803@codemonkey.ws> (Anthony Liguori's message of
	"Thu\, 09 Jul 2009 08\:32\:00 -0500")
Message-ID: <87eisp1gx2.fsf@pike.pond.sub.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: Mark McLoughlin <markmc@redhat.com>, Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>, "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>

Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws> writes:

> Mark McLoughlin wrote:
>> Hi Anthony,
>>
>> On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 18:57 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>   
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> It's getting to be about the time to start thinking about the
>>> 0.11.0 release.  0.10.0 was released on March 2nd so following with
>>> the 6 month release cycle, that would put 0.11.0 at September 2nd.
>>>
>>> Based on the experiences with the stable releases, here's what I'd
>>> recommend:
>>>
>>>  o On July 15th, fork master -> stable-0.11
>>>     
>>
>> Are you still planning on creating the 0.11 branch next week?
>>   
>
> That's the plan although I need to make sure that all outstanding
> patches have been given adequate review before hand.  I want to give
> any patch that has been posted so far a reasonable chance to make it
> into 0.11.  If I can get through the backlog today, then we'll stay on
> schedule.  Either way, there will be plenty of warning on the ML and
> opportunity for people to make suggestions.
>
> Regards,
>
> Anthony Liguori

Any hope that -device can make the cut?