From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To: Antoine Damhet <antoine.damhet@blade-group.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] target/i386: always create kvmclock device
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 15:34:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ft7gh6gy.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200917122559.e7i5o64k7rw7urdh@tartarus>
Antoine Damhet <antoine.damhet@blade-group.com> writes:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 01:13:06PM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>> QEMU's kvmclock device is only created when KVM PV feature bits for
>> kvmclock (KVM_FEATURE_CLOCKSOURCE/KVM_FEATURE_CLOCKSOURCE2) are
>> exposed to the guest. With 'kvm=off' cpu flag the device is not
>> created and we don't call KVM_GET_CLOCK/KVM_SET_CLOCK upon migration.
>> It was reported that without these call at least Hyper-V TSC page
>> clocksouce (which can be enabled independently) gets broken after
>> migration.
>>
>> Switch to creating kvmclock QEMU device unconditionally, it seems
>> to always make sense to call KVM_GET_CLOCK/KVM_SET_CLOCK on migration.
>> Use KVM_CAP_ADJUST_CLOCK check instead of CPUID feature bits.
>>
>> Reported-by: Antoine Damhet <antoine.damhet@blade-group.com>
>> Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> hw/i386/kvm/clock.c | 6 +-----
>> target/i386/kvm.c | 5 +++++
>> target/i386/kvm_i386.h | 1 +
>> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/i386/kvm/clock.c b/hw/i386/kvm/clock.c
>> index 64283358f91d..526c9ea5172b 100644
>> --- a/hw/i386/kvm/clock.c
>> +++ b/hw/i386/kvm/clock.c
>> @@ -330,11 +330,7 @@ static const TypeInfo kvmclock_info = {
>> /* Note: Must be called after VCPU initialization. */
>> void kvmclock_create(void)
>> {
>> - X86CPU *cpu = X86_CPU(first_cpu);
>> -
>> - if (kvm_enabled() &&
>> - cpu->env.features[FEAT_KVM] & ((1ULL << KVM_FEATURE_CLOCKSOURCE) |
>> - (1ULL << KVM_FEATURE_CLOCKSOURCE2))) {
>> + if (kvm_enabled() && kvm_has_adjust_clock()) {
>
> Shouldn't the old check used when machine type <= 5.1 in order to avoid
> migration incompatibility ?
Hm, when the check fails we just don't create the device and no error is
reported, so even if we have kvmclock data in the migration stream but
fail to create it migration will still succeed, right? (not a migration
expert here :-)
>
>> sysbus_create_simple(TYPE_KVM_CLOCK, -1, NULL);
>> }
>> }
>> diff --git a/target/i386/kvm.c b/target/i386/kvm.c
>> index 4a8b3a41c1bc..20b31b65307b 100644
>> --- a/target/i386/kvm.c
>> +++ b/target/i386/kvm.c
>> @@ -143,6 +143,11 @@ bool kvm_has_adjust_clock_stable(void)
>> return (ret == KVM_CLOCK_TSC_STABLE);
>> }
>>
>> +bool kvm_has_adjust_clock(void)
>> +{
>> + return kvm_check_extension(kvm_state, KVM_CAP_ADJUST_CLOCK);
>> +}
>> +
>> bool kvm_has_exception_payload(void)
>> {
>> return has_exception_payload;
>> diff --git a/target/i386/kvm_i386.h b/target/i386/kvm_i386.h
>> index 064b8798a26c..0fce4e51d2d6 100644
>> --- a/target/i386/kvm_i386.h
>> +++ b/target/i386/kvm_i386.h
>> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
>>
>> bool kvm_allows_irq0_override(void);
>> bool kvm_has_smm(void);
>> +bool kvm_has_adjust_clock(void);
>> bool kvm_has_adjust_clock_stable(void);
>> bool kvm_has_exception_payload(void);
>> void kvm_synchronize_all_tsc(void);
>> --
>> 2.25.4
>>
>>
--
Vitaly
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-17 13:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-17 11:13 [PATCH] target/i386: always create kvmclock device Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-09-17 11:18 ` no-reply
2020-09-17 11:41 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-09-17 12:25 ` Antoine Damhet
2020-09-17 13:34 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov [this message]
2020-09-17 14:42 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-09-17 14:58 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-09-17 17:44 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-09-18 8:39 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-09-18 15:12 ` Antoine Damhet
2020-09-18 15:26 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-09-22 15:19 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-09-17 15:00 ` Antoine Damhet
2020-09-18 8:38 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ft7gh6gy.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com \
--to=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=antoine.damhet@blade-group.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).