From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44505) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dJEYu-0005b6-G8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 09 Jun 2017 03:42:29 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dJEYq-0006d0-K9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 09 Jun 2017 03:42:28 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:56626) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dJEYq-0006cu-EL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 09 Jun 2017 03:42:24 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72BBA8553E for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2017 07:42:23 +0000 (UTC) From: Juan Quintela In-Reply-To: <1496980142-8986-3-git-send-email-peterx@redhat.com> (Peter Xu's message of "Fri, 9 Jun 2017 11:48:58 +0800") References: <1496980142-8986-1-git-send-email-peterx@redhat.com> <1496980142-8986-3-git-send-email-peterx@redhat.com> Reply-To: quintela@redhat.com Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2017 09:42:18 +0200 Message-ID: <87fuf9a9ph.fsf@secure.mitica> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/6] migration: let MigrationState be a qdev List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Xu Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Markus Armbruster , Laurent Vivier , "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" Peter Xu wrote: > Let the old man "MigrationState" join the object family. Direct benefit > is that we can start to use all the property features derived from > current QDev, like: HW_COMPAT_* bits, command line setup for migration > parameters (so will never need to set them up each time using HMP/QMP, > this is really, really attractive for test writters), etc. > > I see no reason to disallow this happen yet. So let's start from this > one, to see whether it would be anything good. > > No functional change at all. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Xu Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela