From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35360)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alex.bennee@linaro.org>) id 1W0ue6-0001Jo-T6
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 08 Jan 2014 10:02:19 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alex.bennee@linaro.org>) id 1W0udw-0007TK-Dh
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 08 Jan 2014 10:02:14 -0500
Received: from static.88-198-71-155.clients.your-server.de
	([88.198.71.155]:60290 helo=socrates.bennee.com)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alex.bennee@linaro.org>) id 1W0udw-0007Sx-74
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 08 Jan 2014 10:02:04 -0500
References: <1389191134-16597-1-git-send-email-alex.bennee@linaro.org>
	<1389191134-16597-2-git-send-email-alex.bennee@linaro.org>
	<52CD65A3.1090306@suse.de>
From: Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?= <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
In-reply-to: <52CD65A3.1090306@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 15:02:35 +0000
Message-ID: <87fvoy8qk4.fsf@linaro.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] scripts/qemu-binfmt-conf.sh: re-factor
	and clean-up
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Andreas =?utf-8?Q?F=C3=A4rber?= <afaerber@suse.de>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, patches@linaro.org


afaerber@suse.de writes:

> Hi,
>
> Am 08.01.2014 15:25, schrieb alex.bennee@linaro.org:
>> From: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
>> 
>> I was looking to set-up for development but found the script made some
>> hard-coded assumptions. It doesn't seem the script is used by the
>> distros but if it had a little more love maybe it would be ;-)
<snip>
>
> Apart from both patches missing a Sob, did you take a look at the

I didn't think SoB was needed for RFC patches?

> refactoring we discussed with Laurent Vivier (?) a while back?
>
> Essentially, there's multiple ways to register this, and based on our
> feedback he refactored it so that the magic strings can be retrieved
> individually. Don't remember where that got stuck...

I wasn't aware of this. I'll go and have a look through the archives. Thanks.

>
> Regards
> Andreas

-- 
Alex Bennée