From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48595) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SUJDB-0007oS-0t for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 15 May 2012 10:58:58 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SUJD3-0004wB-1E for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 15 May 2012 10:58:52 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:34673) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SUJD2-0004ve-Q9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 15 May 2012 10:58:44 -0400 From: Juan Quintela Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 16:58:40 +0200 Message-ID: <87fwb11of3.fsf@elfo.elfo> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: [Qemu-devel] KVM call minutes May 15th Reply-To: quintela@redhat.com List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: KVM devel mailing list , qemu-devel@nongnu.org This were the topics discussed Today: - open-fd-hook * (anthony): using blockdev is quite complicated. libvirnt would need to know all images formats. * (kevin): libvirt already knows it. * use a filename <-> fd dictionary We are at: having a command to get an fd from libvirt, or asking to libvirt to open a file from use. * should we use a push model? * using /dev/fd? - 1.1 changelog, anything missing at http://wiki.qemu.org/ChangeLog/Next? talk about it on the mailing list - how is 1.1 looking? anthony testing rc2. roadmap for qemu-kvm-1.1