From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:56808) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RLFYZ-00007b-6e for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 10:43:20 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RLFYV-0008Ru-9T for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 10:43:15 -0400 Received: from e5.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.145]:37317) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RLFYV-0008RQ-4o for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 10:43:11 -0400 Received: from /spool/local by e5.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 1 Nov 2011 10:33:41 -0400 Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (d01av04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.64]) by d01relay03.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id pA1EWiZF256218 for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2011 10:32:44 -0400 Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av04.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id pA1EWiDB021771 for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2011 10:32:44 -0400 From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" In-Reply-To: <20111101075051.GA27637@stefanha-thinkpad.localdomain> References: <1320061773-10634-1-git-send-email-stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <87mxchgi0a.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20111101075051.GA27637@stefanha-thinkpad.localdomain> Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 20:01:39 +0530 Message-ID: <87fwi7hq2c.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] hw/9pfs: use g_vasprintf() instead of rolling our own List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stefan Hajnoczi Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Markus Armbruster On Tue, 1 Nov 2011 07:50:51 +0000, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 11:28:45PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > > On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:49:33 +0000, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > > > Markus Armbruster sent fixes for va_list vararg > > > issues in v9fs_string_alloc_printf(). It turns out the function > > > duplicates g_vasprintf() and can therefore be eliminated entirely. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi > > > > Reviewed-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V > > Do you want to take this into your 9pfs tree? Will push this through v9fs.git Thanks -aneesh