From: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
To: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kwolf@redhat.com,
Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>, Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] migration: Attempt disk reactivation in more failure scenarios
Date: Tue, 09 May 2023 17:36:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h6slcy9y.fsf@secure.mitica> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230502205212.134680-1-eblake@redhat.com> (Eric Blake's message of "Tue, 2 May 2023 15:52:12 -0500")
Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> wrote:
> Commit fe904ea824 added a fail_inactivate label, which tries to
> reactivate disks on the source after a failure while s->state ==
> MIGRATION_STATUS_ACTIVE, but didn't actually use the label if
> qemu_savevm_state_complete_precopy() failed. This failure to
> reactivate is also present in commit 6039dd5b1c (also covering the new
> s->state == MIGRATION_STATUS_DEVICE state) and 403d18ae (ensuring
> s->block_inactive is set more reliably).
>
> Consolidate the two labels back into one - no matter HOW migration is
> failed, if there is any chance we can reach vm_start() after having
> attempted inactivation, it is essential that we have tried to restart
> disks before then. This also makes the cleanup more like
> migrate_fd_cancel().
>
> Suggested-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
I still can't believe that power down disks and decide if restart (or
not) the vm is such a complicated bussiness. Sniff.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-09 15:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-02 20:52 [PATCH] migration: Attempt disk reactivation in more failure scenarios Eric Blake
2023-05-02 21:17 ` Peter Xu
2023-05-08 10:42 ` Kevin Wolf
2023-05-09 15:36 ` Juan Quintela [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87h6slcy9y.fsf@secure.mitica \
--to=quintela@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=leobras@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).