From: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>,
"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
"QEMU Developers" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: Add RX target.
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 21:49:48 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h7yw9xxv.wl-ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA9aOFA7_Tpgvk9Q0yH16B1SLG5zfrU5ZftMsMJ0Zo9YPQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 20:54:16 +0900,
Peter Maydell wrote:
>
> On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 at 11:30, Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 3/9/20 11:28 PM, Yoshinori Sato wrote:
> >
> > >>> +++ b/docs/system/targets.rst
> > >>> @@ -17,3 +17,4 @@ Contents:
> > >>> target-arm
> > >>> target-m68k
> > >>> target-xtensa
> > >>> + target-rx
> > >>
> > >> Is it worth keeping this list alphabetically sorted?
> > >
> > > It was not in alphabetical order, it was added at the last. Is it better
> > > to arrange in alphabetical order?
> >
> > The 3 lines of context was alphabetical, but looking at the whole file,
> > the overall list is not. So sticking yours last is fine after all.
>
> In an ideal world the correct order would probably be
> "alphabetical order of the headline titles in the referenced
> files", so that the displayed ToC is alphabetized.
OK.
Change to alphabetical order.
> thanks
> -- PMM
--
Yosinori Sato
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-10 12:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-08 13:06 [PATCH] docs: Add RX target Yoshinori Sato
2020-03-09 15:07 ` Eric Blake
2020-03-10 4:28 ` Yoshinori Sato
2020-03-10 11:29 ` Eric Blake
2020-03-10 11:54 ` Peter Maydell
2020-03-10 12:49 ` Yoshinori Sato [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87h7yw9xxv.wl-ysato@users.sourceforge.jp \
--to=ysato@users.sourceforge.jp \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=philmd@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).