From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Roman Kagan <rkagan@virtuozzo.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] i386/kvm: expose HV_CPUID_ENLIGHTMENT_INFO.EAX and HV_CPUID_NESTED_FEATURES.EAX as feature words
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 11:54:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h8eb4ihl.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87y38j3r1c.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com>
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> writes:
> Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com> writes:
>
>> On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 06:25:06PM +0100, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>>> Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com> writes:
>>>
>>> > On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 03:17:06PM +0100, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>>> >> Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com> writes:
>>> > [...]
>>> >> > But note that we might still be able to move the existing
>>> >> > "hyperv_*" features to feature_word_info[].feat_names. We just
>>> >> > need to keep the same semantics (e.g. enable
>>> >> > HV_HYPERCALL_AVAILABLE automatically when some features are set).
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Maybe we can make some of the feature properties read-only. This
>>> >> > way we can give them meaningful names for debugging and error
>>> >> > messages, even if we don't want to make them configurable
>>> >> > directly.
>>> >>
>>> >> I'd suggest (if there are no objections of course) we do this separately
>>> >> from this patch. [...]
>>> >
>>> > Agreed.
>>> >
>>>
>>> Paolo, Eduardo,
>>>
>>> in case there are no concerns here, could you please pick this patch up?
>>> Thanks!
>>
>> Queued, thanks!
>>
>> Can you please send the comment you wrote about feat_names as a
>> follow-up patch?
>
> Oops, sorry, I just realized I promissed to send out v2 with it and
> aparently never did. Will send out a follow-up patch shortly. Thanks!
Hey Eduardo,
any news about the fate of this patch?
(Correcting myself: there was v2 with the comment included:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-12/msg00355.html
but as I sent the follow-up patch you requested separately too:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-12/msg05463.html
)
--
Vitaly
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-14 11:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-26 13:59 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] i386/kvm: expose HV_CPUID_ENLIGHTMENT_INFO.EAX and HV_CPUID_NESTED_FEATURES.EAX as feature words Vitaly Kuznetsov
2018-11-27 13:10 ` Roman Kagan
2018-11-29 10:20 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-11-29 11:51 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2018-11-30 18:36 ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-12-03 14:17 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2018-12-04 18:08 ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-12-05 13:12 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2018-12-19 17:25 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2018-12-20 12:05 ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-12-21 14:14 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2019-01-14 10:54 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov [this message]
2019-01-14 14:32 ` Eduardo Habkost
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87h8eb4ihl.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com \
--to=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rkagan@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).