From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44638) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1edgzY-0001f3-Hu for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 13:38:52 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1edgzU-0006mI-FE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 13:38:48 -0500 Received: from mail-wr0-x243.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c0c::243]:36184) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1edgzU-0006lv-8h for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 13:38:44 -0500 Received: by mail-wr0-x243.google.com with SMTP id d9so9778134wre.3 for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 10:38:44 -0800 (PST) References: <20180115115309.23982-1-quintela@redhat.com> <87h8rg2jdh.fsf@secure.laptop> From: Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?= In-reply-to: <87h8rg2jdh.fsf@secure.laptop> Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 18:38:41 +0000 Message-ID: <87h8rdkaby.fsf@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 00/27] Migration pull List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: quintela@redhat.com Cc: Peter Maydell , Alexey Perevalov , Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , Peter Xu , Laurent Vivier , QEMU Developers , "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" Juan Quintela writes: > Peter Maydell wrote: >> On 19 January 2018 at 16:43, Alexey Perevalov = wrote: >>> As I remember, I tested build in QEMU's docker build system, >>> but now I checked it on i386 Ubuntu, and yes linker says about unresolv= ed >>> atomic symbols. Next week, I'll have a time to investigate it deeper. >> >> This sounds like exactly the problem I pointed out in a previous >> round of this patchset :-( >> >> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-01/msg02103.html >> >> Ignoring comments and sending patches anyway makes me grumpy, >> especially when the result is exactly "fails obscurely on >> some architectures only"... > > It compiles for me. F25 i686 gcc. I did change it to use intptr_t > instead of uint64_t. So, I don't know what is going on here. > > Then, I have a report that clang -m32 didn't work (Mat). I haven't been > able yet to reproduce. I don't have 32bits libraries installed on my > x86_64 systems. clang compiles for me on both 64 bits (f27) and 32bits > native (f25, it is a long history that it is not f27). > > So, I can agree that we have to fix anything that don't work, but I > can't agree that I didn't care about comments, at least I tried to fix > the problems you pointed me to. > > What I don't have is an easier way of compiling on arm and ppc32, but I > will search a way to do that for my pull requsets. make docker-test-build@debian-armhf-cross make docker-test-build@debian-powerpc-cross Assuming you have docker setup and working. > > Sorry about the inconveniences. > > Later, Juan. -- Alex Benn=C3=A9e