From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MsLga-00015h-IG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 15:15:00 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MsLgV-00014q-Hc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 15:14:59 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=48166 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MsLgV-00014n-62 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 15:14:55 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:56385) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MsLgU-0003gc-5t for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 15:14:55 -0400 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n8SJEk37005867 for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 15:14:46 -0400 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/6] Fix pci_add not to exit on error & other fixes References: <1254153903.2802.3796.camel@blaa> <1254154613.2802.3800.camel@blaa> From: Markus Armbruster Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 21:14:45 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1254154613.2802.3800.camel@blaa> (Mark McLoughlin's message of "Mon\, 28 Sep 2009 17\:16\:53 +0100") Message-ID: <87hbumnaoq.fsf@pike.pond.sub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Mark McLoughlin Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Mark McLoughlin writes: > On Mon, 2009-09-28 at 17:05 +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote: >> On Fri, 2009-09-25 at 03:53 +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote: >> > Markus Armbruster (6): >> > Fix pci_vga_init() not to ignore bus argument >> > Fix pci_add storage not to exit on bad first argument >> > Make it obvious that pci_nic_init() can't fail >> > Fix pci_add nic not to exit on bad model >> > pci_create() is now unused, remove it >> > Rename pci_create_noinit() to pci_create() >> >> Looks like a good series to me too >> >> Acked-by: Mark McLoughlin > > Oh, and IMHO, at least patches 3 and 4 makes sense for stable-0.11; > patch 4 just needs an update for e1000 being the default model now > > Patch 2 might make sense too with a little massaging Yes. The others are mere cleanup, doubt they're appropriate for stable.