From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71899C433E0 for ; Sat, 23 May 2020 10:21:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 350F9206DD for ; Sat, 23 May 2020 10:21:17 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 350F9206DD Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=bugs.launchpad.net Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:59906 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jcRHI-0006Q1-By for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Sat, 23 May 2020 06:21:16 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43524) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jcRGj-0005kj-NA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 23 May 2020 06:20:41 -0400 Received: from indium.canonical.com ([91.189.90.7]:48520) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jcRGi-000085-Eq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 23 May 2020 06:20:41 -0400 Received: from loganberry.canonical.com ([91.189.90.37]) by indium.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2 #2 (Debian)) id 1jcRGg-0005hA-7k for ; Sat, 23 May 2020 10:20:38 +0000 Received: from loganberry.canonical.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by loganberry.canonical.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28A5A2E8075 for ; Sat, 23 May 2020 10:20:38 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Sat, 23 May 2020 10:14:36 -0000 From: =?utf-8?q?Alex_Benn=C3=A9e?= <1880225@bugs.launchpad.net> To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Launchpad-Notification-Type: bug X-Launchpad-Bug: product=qemu; status=Confirmed; importance=Undecided; assignee=alex.bennee@linaro.org; X-Launchpad-Bug-Tags: arm testcase X-Launchpad-Bug-Information-Type: Public X-Launchpad-Bug-Private: no X-Launchpad-Bug-Security-Vulnerability: no X-Launchpad-Bug-Commenters: ajbennee aleksandar-markovic X-Launchpad-Bug-Reporter: Aleksandar Markovic (aleksandar-markovic) X-Launchpad-Bug-Modifier: =?utf-8?q?Alex_Benn=C3=A9e_=28ajbennee=29?= References: <159017301531.7966.9120113243897778171.malonedeb@gac.canonical.com> <159022032235.30383.6500371953316064428.malone@wampee.canonical.com> Message-Id: <87imgnrm9f.fsf@linaro.org> Subject: Re: [Bug 1880225] Re: Emulation of some arm programs fail with "Assertion `have_guest_base' failed." X-Launchpad-Message-Rationale: Subscriber (QEMU) @qemu-devel-ml X-Launchpad-Message-For: qemu-devel-ml Precedence: bulk X-Generated-By: Launchpad (canonical.com); Revision="1f7bc749b40714a4cc10f5e4d787118a78037035"; Instance="production-secrets-lazr.conf" X-Launchpad-Hash: 5493c113b5fe09aac6c56ae64112f20f5321c5de Received-SPF: none client-ip=91.189.90.7; envelope-from=bounces@canonical.com; helo=indium.canonical.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/05/23 03:45:44 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -65 X-Spam_score: -6.6 X-Spam_bar: ------ X-Spam_report: (-6.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Bug 1880225 <1880225@bugs.launchpad.net> Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Aleksandar Markovic <1880225@bugs.launchpad.net> writes: > The problem may be in int_guest_commpage() - it returns false. > >>>From gdb debugging session: > > (gdb) p addr > $1 =3D (void *) 0xb7ffd000 > (gdb) p want > $2 =3D (void *) 0xffff0000 > (gdb) n > 398 if (addr !=3D want) { > (gdb) p qemu_host_page_size > $3 =3D 4096 > (gdb) l > 393 = > 394 if (addr =3D=3D MAP_FAILED) { > 395 perror("Allocating guest commpage"); > 396 exit(EXIT_FAILURE); > 397 } > 398 if (addr !=3D want) { > 399 return false; > 400 } > 401 = > 402 /* Set kernel helper versions; rest of page is 0. */ > (gdb) I'm not totally convinced the calculation that we do to work out the extended size of the guest space in 32 bit: 11:10 alex@debian-buster-i386/i686 [arm/bugs/add-mmap-fallback@github] >= ./arm-linux-user/qemu-arm tests/tcg/arm-linux-user/sha1 pgb_static: loaddr: 10000 pgb_static: loaddr: ffff0000 pgb_find_hole: ffff0000:10809a8 (1000) pgb_find_hole: 0:10809a8 init_guest_commpage: 0xffff0000 -> 0xb7f48000 (4096) qemu-arm: /home/alex/lsrc/qemu.git/linux-user/elfload.c:2350: probe_guest= _base: Assertion `have_guest_base' failed. Aborted (core dumped) Or in fact why we don't do a MAP_FIXED ass we should have ensured we have enough space allocated for the guest. Richard any ideas? -- = Alex Benn=C3=A9e -- = You received this bug notification because you are a member of qemu- devel-ml, which is subscribed to QEMU. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1880225 Title: Emulation of some arm programs fail with "Assertion `have_guest_base' failed." Status in QEMU: Confirmed Bug description: This issue is observer with QEMU ToT, checked out around May 15th (but I believe it is present in current master too), and wasn't present in QEMU v5.0.0. I am using 32-bit Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1.73GHz host. Arm cross-compiler is a standard cross-compiler that comes with Debian-based distributions, and gcc version is: $ arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc --version arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (Debian 8.3.0-2) 8.3.0 Compile this program with cross compiler: $ arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc -O2 -static toupper_string.c -o toupper_string-arm Emulation with QEMU v5.0.0 is correct, and gives expected output: $ ~/Build/qemu-5.0.0/build-gcc/arm-linux-user/qemu-arm ./toupper_string-a= rm CONTROL RESULT: (toupper_string) nwlrbbmqbhcdarz owkkyhiddqscdxr jmowfrxsjybldbe fsarcbynecdyggx xpklorel= lnmpapq NWLRBBMQBHCDARZ OWKKYHIDDQSCDXR JMOWFRXSJYBLDBE FSARCBYNECDYGGX XPKLOREL= LNMPAPQ While, in case of QEMU master it fails: $ ~/Build/qemu-master/build-gcc/arm-linux-user/qemu-arm ./toupper_string-= arm qemu-arm: /home/rtrk/Build/qemu-master/linux-user/elfload.c:2294: probe_g= uest_base: Assertion `have_guest_base' failed. Aborted There are many other programs that exibit the same behavior. The failure is arm-sprecific. = ----------------------------------------------------- source code: (let's call this file toupper_string.c) (similar file is also in attachment) = #include #include #include #include = #define MAX_STRING_LENGHT 15 #define NUMBER_OF_RANDOM_STRINGS 100 #define DEFAULT_NUMBER_OF_REPETITIONS 30000 #define MAX_NUMBER_OF_REPETITIONS 1000000000 #define NUMBER_OF_CONTROL_PRINT_ITEMS 5 /* Structure for keeping an array of strings */ struct StringStruct { char chars[MAX_STRING_LENGHT + 1]; }; /** * Sets characters of the given string to random small letters a-z. * @param s String to get random characters. * @len Length of the input string. */ static void gen_random_string(char *chars, const int len) { static const char letters[] =3D "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz"; for (size_t i =3D 0; i < len; i++) { chars[i] =3D letters[rand() % (sizeof(letters) - 1)]; } chars[len] =3D 0; } void main (int argc, char* argv[]) { struct StringStruct random_strings[NUMBER_OF_RANDOM_STRINGS]; struct StringStruct strings_to_be_uppercased[NUMBER_OF_RANDOM_STRINGS= ]; int32_t number_of_repetitions =3D DEFAULT_NUMBER_OF_REPETITIONS; int32_t option; /* Parse command line options */ while ((option =3D getopt(argc, argv, "n:")) !=3D -1) { if (option =3D=3D 'n') { int32_t user_number_of_repetitions =3D atoi(optarg); /* Check if the value is a negative number */ if (user_number_of_repetitions < 1) { fprintf(stderr, "Error ... Value for option '-n' cannot b= e a " "negative number.\n"); exit(EXIT_FAILURE); } /* Check if the value is a string or zero */ if (user_number_of_repetitions =3D=3D 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Error ... Invalid value for option '-n'.= \n"); exit(EXIT_FAILURE); } /* Check if the value is too large */ if (user_number_of_repetitions > MAX_NUMBER_OF_REPETITIONS) { fprintf(stderr, "Error ... Value for option '-n' cannot b= e " "more than %d.\n", MAX_NUMBER_OF_REPETITI= ONS); exit(EXIT_FAILURE); } number_of_repetitions =3D user_number_of_repetitions; } else { exit(EXIT_FAILURE); } } /* Create an array of strings with random content */ srand(1); for (size_t i =3D 0; i < NUMBER_OF_RANDOM_STRINGS; i++) { gen_random_string(random_strings[i].chars, MAX_STRING_LENGHT); } /* Perform uppercasing of a set of random strings multiple times */ for (size_t j =3D 0; j < number_of_repetitions; j++) { /* Copy initial set of random strings to the set to be uppercased= */ memcpy(strings_to_be_uppercased, random_strings, NUMBER_OF_RANDOM_STRINGS * (MAX_STRING_LENGHT + 1)); /* Do actual changing case to uppercase */ for (size_t i =3D 0; i < NUMBER_OF_RANDOM_STRINGS; i++) { int k =3D 0; = while (strings_to_be_uppercased[i].chars[k]) { = char ch =3D strings_to_be_uppercased[i].chars[k] - 32; = memcpy((void *)strings_to_be_uppercased[i].chars + k, &ch, 1); k++; = } = } } /* Control printing */ printf("CONTROL RESULT: (toupper_string)\n"); for (size_t i =3D 0; i < NUMBER_OF_CONTROL_PRINT_ITEMS; i++) { printf(" %s", random_strings[i].chars); } printf("\n"); for (size_t i =3D 0; i < NUMBER_OF_CONTROL_PRINT_ITEMS; i++) { printf(" %s", strings_to_be_uppercased[i].chars); } printf("\n"); } To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1880225/+subscriptions