From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37592) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YTlD0-00085N-0x for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2015 00:54:05 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YTlCw-0001Ry-RR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2015 00:54:01 -0500 Received: from e23smtp01.au.ibm.com ([202.81.31.143]:59035) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YTlCw-0001RI-4A for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2015 00:53:58 -0500 Received: from /spool/local by e23smtp01.au.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 15:53:54 +1000 Received: from d23relay09.au.ibm.com (d23relay09.au.ibm.com [9.185.63.181]) by d23dlp02.au.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F11322BB004D for ; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 16:53:49 +1100 (EST) Received: from d23av01.au.ibm.com (d23av01.au.ibm.com [9.190.234.96]) by d23relay09.au.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id t265reKk43253976 for ; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 16:53:49 +1100 Received: from d23av01.au.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d23av01.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id t265rFOs029552 for ; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 16:53:15 +1100 From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" In-Reply-To: <54F7786F.2020409@msgid.tls.msk.ru> References: <54F7786F.2020409@msgid.tls.msk.ru> Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2015 11:22:56 +0530 Message-ID: <87ioeesmdj.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] 9pfs-proxy: -retval vs errno vs -1 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Michael Tokarev Cc: qemu-devel , Anthony Liguori Michael Tokarev writes: > Another interesting tidbit is in hw/9pfs/virtio-9p-proxy.c. > > All filesystem methods use common v9fs_request() function, > which returns -errno. So far so good. > > Now, *all* places which call this function, does this: > > retval = v9fs_request(...); > if (retval < 0) { > errno = -retval; > } > return retval; > > and *some* does this: > > retval = v9fs_request(...); > if (retval < 0) { > errno = -retval; > retval = -1; > } > return retval; We should be able to drop that retval = -1; -aneesh