From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57009) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UPdIU-0001Hj-Rl for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Apr 2013 14:29:35 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UPdIT-0005Tc-JT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Apr 2013 14:29:34 -0400 Received: from e23smtp06.au.ibm.com ([202.81.31.148]:42765) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UPdIT-0005TL-3N for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Apr 2013 14:29:33 -0400 Received: from /spool/local by e23smtp06.au.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 04:23:46 +1000 Received: from d23relay04.au.ibm.com (d23relay04.au.ibm.com [9.190.234.120]) by d23dlp03.au.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFA94357804A for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 04:29:19 +1000 (EST) Received: from d23av03.au.ibm.com (d23av03.au.ibm.com [9.190.234.97]) by d23relay04.au.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id r39IFVDM10486176 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 04:15:32 +1000 Received: from d23av03.au.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d23av03.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id r39ISm3F016482 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 04:28:48 +1000 From: Anthony Liguori In-Reply-To: <51645502.1000304@suse.de> References: <201304082155.r38Lttk6024577@d23av03.au.ibm.com> <51645502.1000304@suse.de> Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 13:28:43 -0500 Message-ID: <87ip3vblt0.fsf@codemonkey.ws> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] main-loop: drop the BQL if the I/O appears to be spinning List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Andreas =?utf-8?Q?F=C3=A4rber?= Cc: Paolo Bonzini , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Peter Maydell Andreas F=C3=A4rber writes: > Am 08.04.2013 23:55, schrieb Anthony Liguori: >> Applied. Thanks. > > I am seeing "main-loop: WARNING: I/O thread spun for 1000 iterations" > for both check-qtest-i386 and check-qtest-x86_64 now, is that expected? > > PMM just recently cleaned up the noisy arm qtest target... :( No, it's not expected. Sounds like there's a flow control bug in qtest. Regards, Anthony Liguori > > Andreas > > --=20 > SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=C3=BCrnberg, Germany > GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend=C3=B6rffer; HRB 16746 AG N=C3= =BCrnberg