From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55462) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T5ziF-0002mf-SD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 09:50:49 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T5zi8-0002B5-Bj for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 09:50:43 -0400 Received: from mail-ob0-f173.google.com ([209.85.214.173]:57744) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T5zi8-0002Aj-6w for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 09:50:36 -0400 Received: by obbta14 with SMTP id ta14so7642054obb.4 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 06:50:35 -0700 (PDT) From: Anthony Liguori In-Reply-To: References: <1345703083-25322-1-git-send-email-mmogilvi_qemu@miniinfo.net> Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 08:50:31 -0500 Message-ID: <87ipc4a1g8.fsf@codemonkey.ws> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/6] Running Microport UNIX (ca 1987) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: malc , Matthew Ogilvie Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org malc writes: > On Thu, 23 Aug 2012, Matthew Ogilvie wrote: > >> After applying this version 2 of this patch series, I can >> successfully run "Micoport UNIX System V/386, v 2.1" (ca 1987) >> under qemu. (although not if I try to enable KVM) >> >> Version 1 of this series was posted about 4 weeks ago. See >> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/qemu-devel/list/?submitter=15654 >> >> The patches are all independent, except that the documentation part >> of patch 5 (vga) adds onto patch 4 (retrace=) changes. > > [..snip..] > > Applied, thanks. malc, please revert these patches. They were not adequately reviewed and they also do not qualify for the stage of the release we're in. Regards, Anthony Liguori > -- > mailto:av1474@comtv.ru