From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43825) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sv0iD-0007Lw-E0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 28 Jul 2012 02:41:18 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sv0iC-0003Fn-Cb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 28 Jul 2012 02:41:17 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:60204) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sv0iC-0003Fh-4V for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 28 Jul 2012 02:41:16 -0400 From: Markus Armbruster References: <87629cvz5b.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2012 08:41:11 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Blue Swirl's message of "Fri, 27 Jul 2012 19:00:00 +0000") Message-ID: <87ipd8s7zs.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Funny -m arguments can crash List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Blue Swirl Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, jan.kiszka@siemens.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Avi Kivity Blue Swirl writes: > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote: >> Asking for "funny" memory sizes sometimes crashes for me. For instance >> -m 0.8 or the equivalent -m 838860b. -m 0.7 appears to work. >> >> Should we round memory sizes? How? Where? > > We had a discussion about this recently: > http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2012-06/msg02800.html I missed that, thanks! Unfortunately, the thread petered out without a conclusion. What now?