Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] hw/loongarch: Rename LOONGARCH_MACHINE with LOONGARCH_VIRT_MACHINE

[Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>]

Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> writes:

> On 08/05/2024 05.11, Bibo Mao wrote:
>> On LoongArch system, there is only virt machine type now, name
>> LOONGARCH_MACHINE is confused, rename it with LOONGARCH_VIRT_MACHINE.
>> Machine name about Other real hw boards can be added in future.
>> Signed-off-by: Bibo Mao <maobibo@loongson.cn>
>> ---
> ...
>> diff --git a/hw/loongarch/virt.c b/hw/loongarch/virt.c
>> index c0999878df..6619cb52a9 100644
>> --- a/hw/loongarch/virt.c
>> +++ b/hw/loongarch/virt.c
> ...
>> @@ -1208,7 +1208,6 @@ static void loongarch_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
>>       MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_CLASS(oc);
>>       HotplugHandlerClass *hc = HOTPLUG_HANDLER_CLASS(oc);
>>   -    mc->desc = "Loongson-3A5000 LS7A1000 machine";
>>       mc->init = loongarch_init;
>>       mc->default_ram_size = 1 * GiB;
>>       mc->default_cpu_type = LOONGARCH_CPU_TYPE_NAME("la464");
>
>  Hi!
>
> I noticed that the machine now does not have any description anymore, which is kind of ugly when you list the available machines:
>
> $ ./qemu-system-loongarch64 -M help
> Supported machines are:
> none                 empty machine
> virt                 (null) (default)
>
> Could you please come up with a new mc->desc for the virt machine?

Formatting a null pointer with %s is actually a crash bug on some
systems.