From: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-arm@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] target/arm: Avoid over-length shift in arm_cpu_sve_finalize() error case
Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2023 17:00:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87jzvffywd.fsf@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230704154332.3014896-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> writes:
> If you build QEMU with the clang sanitizer enabled, you can see it
> fire when running the arm-cpu-features test:
>
> $ QTEST_QEMU_BINARY=./build/arm-clang/qemu-system-aarch64 ./build/arm-clang/tests/qtest/arm-cpu-features
> [...]
> ../../target/arm/cpu64.c:125:19: runtime error: shift exponent 64 is too large for 64-bit type 'unsigned long long'
> [...]
>
> This happens because the user can specify some incorrect SVE
> properties that result in our calculating a max_vq of 0. We catch
> this and error out, but before we do that we calculate
>
> vq_mask = MAKE_64BIT_MASK(0, max_vq);$
>
> and the MAKE_64BIT_MASK() call is only valid for lengths that are
> greater than zero, so we hit the undefined behaviour.
Hmm that does make me worry we could have more land mines waiting to be
found. Would converting MAKE_64BIT_MASK into an inline function and
asserting be a better solution?
>
> Change the logic so that if max_vq is 0 we specifically set vq_mask
> to 0 without going via MAKE_64BIT_MASK(). This lets us drop the
> max_vq check from the error-exit logic, because if max_vq is 0 then
> vq_map must now be 0.
>
> The UB only happens in the case where the user passed us an incorrect
> set of SVE properties, so it's not a big problem in practice.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
--
Alex Bennée
Virtualisation Tech Lead @ Linaro
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-04 16:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-04 15:43 [PATCH] target/arm: Avoid over-length shift in arm_cpu_sve_finalize() error case Peter Maydell
2023-07-04 15:52 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-07-04 15:57 ` Peter Maydell
2023-07-04 16:00 ` Alex Bennée [this message]
2023-07-05 14:45 ` Richard Henderson
2023-07-06 10:27 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-07-05 14:36 ` Richard Henderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87jzvffywd.fsf@linaro.org \
--to=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).