From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36825) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WiSJd-0003RC-6P for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 May 2014 13:41:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WiSJW-0007Fs-5r for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 May 2014 13:41:05 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:38751) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WiSJV-0007Fo-Ue for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 May 2014 13:40:58 -0400 From: Juan Quintela In-Reply-To: (Peter Maydell's message of "Thu, 8 May 2014 13:01:41 +0100") References: <1398091304-10677-1-git-send-email-quintela@redhat.com> <1398091304-10677-5-git-send-email-quintela@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 19:40:53 +0200 Message-ID: <87k39w184a.fsf@elfo.mitica> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 004/124] savevm: Remove all the unneded version_minimum_id_old (arm) Reply-To: quintela@redhat.com List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: QEMU Developers Peter Maydell wrote: > On 21 April 2014 17:18, Peter Maydell wrote: >> On 21 April 2014 15:39, Juan Quintela wrote: >>> After previous Peter patch, they are redundant. This way we don't asign them >>> except when needed. Once there, there were lots of case where the ".fields" >>> indentation was wrong: >>> >>> .fields = (VMStateField []) { >>> and >>> .fields = (VMStateField []) { >>> >>> Change all the combinations to: >>> >>> .fields = (VMStateField[]){ >>> >>> The biggest problem (appart of aesthetics) was that checkpatch complained >>> when we copy&pasted the code from one place to another. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela >>> --- >> >> Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell >> >> I'll hold this to apply to target-arm.next when you've got the dependent >> patch into master. > > The dependent patch is now in master so I'm going to include this > in the target-arm queue (with the various typos Eric pointed out > in the commit message fixed). I have it on mine. And the "rest" part was also reviewed-by. I can include it on my next pull request, or do it yourself, whatever is easier for you. Later, Juan.