From: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] hw/s390x: Don't call register_savevm_live() during instance_init()
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 13:32:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lebtshf8.fsf@secure.mitica> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231020150554.664422-1-thuth@redhat.com> (Thomas Huth's message of "Fri, 20 Oct 2023 17:05:51 +0200")
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> wrote:
> We must not call register_savevm_live() during instance_init()
> since instances can be created at any time, e.g. during introspection
> of a device. We must register the savevm handler during realize()
> instead. Fix it now in the s390x devices.
>
> v2:
> - Fixed bug in the third patch ("sas" -> "dev")
> - Add an early return in case of error in the third patch
> - Added Acked-by/Reviewed by from David and Eric (thanks!)
>
> Thomas Huth (3):
> hw/s390x/s390-skeys: Don't call register_savevm_live() during
> instance_init()
> hw/s390x/s390-stattrib: Simplify handling of the "migration-enabled"
> property
> hw/s390x/s390-stattrib: Don't call register_savevm_live() during
> instance_init()
>
> hw/s390x/s390-skeys.c | 35 ++++++-------------------
> hw/s390x/s390-stattrib.c | 55 +++++++++++++++-------------------------
> 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)
Acked-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
It makes things work for my test, Thanks.
Should I get those through the migration tree?
Later, Juan.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-23 11:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-20 15:05 [PATCH v2 0/3] hw/s390x: Don't call register_savevm_live() during instance_init() Thomas Huth
2023-10-20 15:05 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] hw/s390x/s390-skeys: " Thomas Huth
2023-10-20 15:05 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] hw/s390x/s390-stattrib: Simplify handling of the "migration-enabled" property Thomas Huth
2023-10-20 15:05 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] hw/s390x/s390-stattrib: Don't call register_savevm_live() during instance_init() Thomas Huth
2023-10-23 11:32 ` Juan Quintela [this message]
2023-10-23 11:35 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] hw/s390x: " Thomas Huth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87lebtshf8.fsf@secure.mitica \
--to=quintela@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).