From: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: How to best make include/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.h self-contained
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2022 14:09:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lengg1v4.fsf@pond.sub.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221207020305-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (Michael S. Tsirkin's message of "Wed, 7 Dec 2022 05:18:41 -0500")
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> writes:
> On Wed, Dec 07, 2022 at 07:25:49AM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> pcie_sriov.h needs PCI_NUM_REGIONS from pci.h, but doesn't include it.
>> pci.h must be included before pcie_sriov.h or else compile fails.
>>
>> Adding #include "pci/pci.h" to pcie_sriov would be wrong, because it
>> would close an inclusion loop: pci.h includes pcie.h (for
>> PCIExpressDevice) includes pcie_sriov.h (for PCIESriovPF) includes pci.h
>> (for PCI_NUM_REGIONS).
>>
>> The obvious solution is to move PCI_NUM_REGIONS pci.h somewhere
>> pcie_sriov.h can include without creating a loop.
>>
>> We already have a few headers that don't include anything: pci_ids.h,
>> pci_regs.h (includes include/standard-headers/linux/pci_regs.h, which
>> doesn't count), pcie_regs.h. Moving PCI_NUM_REGIONS to one of these
>> would work, but it doesn't feel right.
>>
>> We could create a new one, say pci_defs.h. Just for PCI_NUM_REGIONS
>> feels silly. So, what else should move there?
>
> I'm ok with pci_defs.h
> However, I note that most headers including pci.h don't really
> need it. Consider include/hw/virtio/virtio-iommu.h all it needs is
> PCIBus typedef this is available from qemu/typedefs.h
> So if you are poking at this, want to clean that area up generally?
I looked into this, which made me reconsider my pci_defs.h idea.
Instead of splitting off pci_defs.h for PCI_NUM_REGIONS and similar
stuff (which stuff exactly?), I'm going to split off pci_device.h for
PCIDevice & friends.
[...]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-09 13:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-07 6:25 How to best make include/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.h self-contained Markus Armbruster
2022-12-07 9:02 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2022-12-07 10:29 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-12-07 10:18 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-12-09 13:09 ` Markus Armbruster [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87lengg1v4.fsf@pond.sub.org \
--to=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=marcel@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).