From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9522EC2BB55 for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 12:33:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6068921973 for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 12:33:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="dGpqu9hw" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6068921973 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:33716 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jP3ho-0005U7-JT for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 08:33:20 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54885) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jP3gR-0004mV-T8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 08:31:56 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jP3gQ-0000i2-Rl for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 08:31:55 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x344.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::344]:54047) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jP3gQ-0000hF-Dh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 08:31:54 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-x344.google.com with SMTP id d77so4393510wmd.3 for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 05:31:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=lE/JroP4XWtFM6qeG6OSaw5rLd3663TauUL5q2SZ5Q0=; b=dGpqu9hwfIV3N4WHDGO0jCmOGaUUI6m3rrqSP2YDSBkUtbytuP9AnJBlV9pqcGAQqX NIiSF3yPUuru09KGJpAZavvean6MgJCpWy4SKazw2bofADIaPLklHzdmIdVrnRz9xPLw QJnmmx4KT3L+IbI9id3E7zm3SIqbU7tY8sNrGwxMsK1YduVAgYc/lF5v+e1zorQyOPFG ROibBMuCDiH8+CGDkeZ2ADVLXlvDUgt0LCDA0C3K+8FA0KC8h7MAEkBpsVsdwVFSWEm/ CrMnP27K2sPxGAvY2Gd/o4GwXmLWSA4UZP6arM5iAI+yhxggrFp5uiZxcyQvS76KogvW j22g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject :in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=lE/JroP4XWtFM6qeG6OSaw5rLd3663TauUL5q2SZ5Q0=; b=Adk7NEmupI9jW+HS2c/IP+eWTKeiLYWRlgqP7t27JL3cgJhYU7YSjOrt98M/g35L2g PqKi10EHgOx5M5248xorEOllbDWhlJP9kHXU+SyieM9YttUCsKwP6a6vQ5yhWe+LUGGt qvWHpkdR5/fqXbuE233s7EvZK5rBNc6zf0WhdKcQeKpdjefi/7moHqPNl0zThKQCVRBh GdmQ+hj8//nJl9noro5v3gqGVzpgXN3zK3RGc9CDb3ZgTmgMhlPO9SbMwSVoL77GW4IQ N2KUyUKTOQBWQ+zdSlzeRVjjga+WSwyVFpRuri3PwT1pzRhDG8AutOX6KbfP7gk4nMeT kGkA== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuaZmoQ17vcWLa+8wv7X8jsSTRdxpdX9FZZD9SoNkM8CqKLBYOu5 6kAXqOySAPmkvUAqP4jx2KrvXQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJRO2DMxuEW/vhQALc2ySYrgXY8ruVCUh+wucReOxkhrRbjPXkku+YGHgE7mXEIc/C3AXvT4w== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:cbd6:: with SMTP id n22mr4540956wmi.98.1587040313054; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 05:31:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zen.linaroharston ([51.148.130.216]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c18sm26808155wrx.5.2020.04.16.05.31.51 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 16 Apr 2020 05:31:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zen (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zen.linaroharston (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F7A81FF7E; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 13:31:51 +0100 (BST) References: <20200415173329.4920-1-jsnow@redhat.com> <17333d73-f5be-b43b-0087-22529f985a50@redhat.com> User-agent: mu4e 1.3.10; emacs 28.0.50 From: Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?= To: John Snow Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] configure: prefer sphinx-build to sphinx-build-3 In-reply-to: <17333d73-f5be-b43b-0087-22529f985a50@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 13:31:51 +0100 Message-ID: <87lfmvfw7c.fsf@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4864:20::344 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Peter Maydell , Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , Markus Armbruster , Eduardo Habkost Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" John Snow writes: > On 4/15/20 1:55 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: >> On Wed, 15 Apr 2020 at 18:33, John Snow wrote: >>> >>> sphinx-build is the name of the script entry point from the sphinx >>> package itself. sphinx-build-3 is a pacakging convention by Linux >>> distributions. Prefer, where possible, the canonical package name. >>=20 >> This was Markus's code originally; cc'ing him. >>=20 >> (Incidentally I think when we say "Linux distributions" we >> really mean "Red Hat"; Debian/Ubuntu don't use the "sphinx-build-3" name= .) >>=20 > > I'll take your word for it :) > >> thanks >> -- PMM >> (rest of email untrimmed for context) >>=20 > > My only goal here is that if you are using a virtual environment with > sphinx installed that it prefers that, so non-standard names need to > come last. > > There's probably 10,000,000 ways to do that, hence the RFC. What's wrong with just passing --sphinx-build=3Dsphinx-build in your configure string? It will override whatever we auto-detect AFAICT. --=20 Alex Benn=C3=A9e