From: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
To: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>,
groug@kaod.org, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
clg@kaod.org
Cc: lvivier@redhat.com, Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong.eric@gmail.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
paulus@samba.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>,
David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 12/18] target/ppc: Don't store VRMA SLBE persistently
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 21:25:07 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lfor5x98.fsf@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200224233724.46415-13-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> writes:
> Currently, we construct the SLBE used for VRMA translations when the LPCR
> is written (which controls some bits in the SLBE), then use it later for
> translations.
>
> This is a bit complex and confusing - simplify it by simply constructing
> the SLBE directly from the LPCR when we need it.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> target/ppc/cpu.h | 3 ---
> target/ppc/mmu-hash64.c | 28 ++++++----------------------
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/ppc/cpu.h b/target/ppc/cpu.h
> index f9871b1233..5a55fb02bd 100644
> --- a/target/ppc/cpu.h
> +++ b/target/ppc/cpu.h
> @@ -1044,9 +1044,6 @@ struct CPUPPCState {
> uint32_t flags;
> uint64_t insns_flags;
> uint64_t insns_flags2;
> -#if defined(TARGET_PPC64)
> - ppc_slb_t vrma_slb;
> -#endif
>
> int error_code;
> uint32_t pending_interrupts;
> diff --git a/target/ppc/mmu-hash64.c b/target/ppc/mmu-hash64.c
> index ac21c14f68..f8bf92aa2e 100644
> --- a/target/ppc/mmu-hash64.c
> +++ b/target/ppc/mmu-hash64.c
> @@ -825,6 +825,7 @@ int ppc_hash64_handle_mmu_fault(PowerPCCPU *cpu, vaddr eaddr,
> {
> CPUState *cs = CPU(cpu);
> CPUPPCState *env = &cpu->env;
> + ppc_slb_t vrma_slbe;
> ppc_slb_t *slb;
> unsigned apshift;
> hwaddr ptex;
> @@ -863,8 +864,8 @@ int ppc_hash64_handle_mmu_fault(PowerPCCPU *cpu, vaddr eaddr,
> }
> } else if (ppc_hash64_use_vrma(env)) {
> /* Emulated VRMA mode */
> - slb = &env->vrma_slb;
> - if (!slb->sps) {
> + slb = &vrma_slbe;
> + if (build_vrma_slbe(cpu, slb) != 0) {
> /* Invalid VRMA setup, machine check */
> cs->exception_index = POWERPC_EXCP_MCHECK;
> env->error_code = 0;
> @@ -1012,6 +1013,7 @@ skip_slb_search:
> hwaddr ppc_hash64_get_phys_page_debug(PowerPCCPU *cpu, target_ulong addr)
> {
> CPUPPCState *env = &cpu->env;
> + ppc_slb_t vrma_slbe;
> ppc_slb_t *slb;
> hwaddr ptex, raddr;
> ppc_hash_pte64_t pte;
> @@ -1033,8 +1035,8 @@ hwaddr ppc_hash64_get_phys_page_debug(PowerPCCPU *cpu, target_ulong addr)
> return raddr | env->spr[SPR_HRMOR];
> } else if (ppc_hash64_use_vrma(env)) {
> /* Emulated VRMA mode */
> - slb = &env->vrma_slb;
> - if (!slb->sps) {
> + slb = &vrma_slbe;
> + if (build_vrma_slbe(cpu, slb) != 0) {
> return -1;
> }
> } else {
> @@ -1072,30 +1074,12 @@ void ppc_hash64_tlb_flush_hpte(PowerPCCPU *cpu, target_ulong ptex,
> cpu->env.tlb_need_flush = TLB_NEED_GLOBAL_FLUSH | TLB_NEED_LOCAL_FLUSH;
> }
>
> -static void ppc_hash64_update_vrma(PowerPCCPU *cpu)
> -{
> - CPUPPCState *env = &cpu->env;
> - ppc_slb_t *slb = &env->vrma_slb;
> -
> - /* Is VRMA enabled ? */
> - if (ppc_hash64_use_vrma(env)) {
> - if (build_vrma_slbe(cpu, slb) == 0) {
> - return;
> - }
> - }
> -
> - /* Otherwise, clear it to indicate error */
> - slb->esid = slb->vsid = 0;
> - slb->sps = NULL;
> -}
> -
> void ppc_store_lpcr(PowerPCCPU *cpu, target_ulong val)
> {
> PowerPCCPUClass *pcc = POWERPC_CPU_GET_CLASS(cpu);
> CPUPPCState *env = &cpu->env;
>
> env->spr[SPR_LPCR] = val & pcc->lpcr_mask;
> - ppc_hash64_update_vrma(cpu);
> }
>
> void helper_store_lpcr(CPUPPCState *env, target_ulong val)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-25 0:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-24 23:37 [PATCH v6 00/18] target/ppc: Correct some errors with real mode handling David Gibson
2020-02-24 23:37 ` [PATCH v6 01/18] pseries: Update SLOF firmware image David Gibson
2020-02-24 23:37 ` [PATCH v6 02/18] ppc: Remove stub support for 32-bit hypervisor mode David Gibson
2020-02-25 6:31 ` Greg Kurz
2020-02-24 23:37 ` [PATCH v6 03/18] ppc: Remove stub of PPC970 HID4 implementation David Gibson
2020-02-24 23:37 ` [PATCH v6 04/18] target/ppc: Correct handling of real mode accesses with vhyp on hash MMU David Gibson
2020-02-25 10:29 ` Greg Kurz
2020-02-24 23:37 ` [PATCH v6 05/18] target/ppc: Introduce ppc_hash64_use_vrma() helper David Gibson
2020-02-25 0:12 ` Fabiano Rosas
2020-02-25 10:30 ` Greg Kurz
2020-02-24 23:37 ` [PATCH v6 06/18] spapr, ppc: Remove VPM0/RMLS hacks for POWER9 David Gibson
2020-02-25 11:29 ` Greg Kurz
2020-02-25 15:58 ` Greg Kurz
2020-02-26 1:00 ` David Gibson
2020-02-24 23:37 ` [PATCH v6 07/18] target/ppc: Remove RMOR register from POWER9 & POWER10 David Gibson
2020-02-25 11:30 ` Greg Kurz
2020-02-24 23:37 ` [PATCH v6 08/18] target/ppc: Use class fields to simplify LPCR masking David Gibson
2020-02-25 15:48 ` Greg Kurz
2020-02-24 23:37 ` [PATCH v6 09/18] target/ppc: Streamline calculation of RMA limit from LPCR[RMLS] David Gibson
2020-02-25 17:05 ` Greg Kurz
2020-02-25 22:47 ` Greg Kurz
2020-02-26 1:04 ` David Gibson
2020-02-26 7:56 ` Greg Kurz
2020-02-27 4:25 ` David Gibson
2020-02-24 23:37 ` [PATCH v6 10/18] target/ppc: Correct RMLS table David Gibson
2020-02-26 8:23 ` Greg Kurz
2020-02-24 23:37 ` [PATCH v6 11/18] target/ppc: Only calculate RMLS derived RMA limit on demand David Gibson
2020-02-26 13:24 ` Greg Kurz
2020-02-27 4:33 ` David Gibson
2020-02-24 23:37 ` [PATCH v6 12/18] target/ppc: Don't store VRMA SLBE persistently David Gibson
2020-02-25 0:25 ` Fabiano Rosas [this message]
2020-02-26 13:29 ` Greg Kurz
2020-02-24 23:37 ` [PATCH v6 13/18] spapr: Don't use weird units for MIN_RMA_SLOF David Gibson
2020-02-25 7:49 ` Cédric Le Goater
2020-02-26 13:32 ` Greg Kurz
2020-02-24 23:37 ` [PATCH v6 14/18] spapr,ppc: Simplify signature of kvmppc_rma_size() David Gibson
2020-02-24 23:37 ` [PATCH v6 15/18] spapr: Don't attempt to clamp RMA to VRMA constraint David Gibson
2020-02-24 23:37 ` [PATCH v6 16/18] spapr: Don't clamp RMA to 16GiB on new machine types David Gibson
2020-02-24 23:37 ` [PATCH v6 17/18] spapr: Clean up RMA size calculation David Gibson
2020-02-25 11:07 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-02-26 1:08 ` David Gibson
2020-02-26 13:37 ` Greg Kurz
2020-02-27 6:04 ` David Gibson
2020-02-24 23:37 ` [PATCH v6 18/18] spapr: Fold spapr_node0_size() into its only caller David Gibson
2020-02-26 14:47 ` Greg Kurz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87lfor5x98.fsf@linux.ibm.com \
--to=farosas@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=clg@kaod.org \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=groug@kaod.org \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=xiaoguangrong.eric@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).