From: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
To: Yuri Benditovich <yuri.benditovich@daynix.com>
Cc: Yan Vugenfirer <yan@daynix.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usbredir: remove 'remote wake' capability from configuration descriptor
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 10:29:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lfs1hdlp.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOEp5OdsYhxD4LE9Qu981uiB+33Xc81z8H=cuwTS6tbU9x_UkA@mail.gmail.com> (Yuri Benditovich's message of "Wed, 27 Nov 2019 09:36:21 +0200")
Yuri Benditovich <yuri.benditovich@daynix.com> writes:
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 8:36 AM Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Yuri Benditovich <yuri.benditovich@daynix.com> writes:
>>
>> > If the redirected device has this capability, Windows guest may
>> > place the device into D2 and expect it to wake when the device
>> > becomes active, but this will never happen. For example, when
>> > internal Bluetooth adapter is redirected, keyboards and mice
>> > connected to it do not work. Setting global property
>> > 'usb-redir.nowake=off' keeps 'remote wake' as is.
>>
>> "usb-redir.nowake=off" is a double negation. Gets weirder when dusted
>> with syntactic sugar: "usb-redir.nonowake". Can we think of a better
>> name? Naming is hard... What about "usb-redir.wakeup=on"?
> '"wakeup" is good but "wakeup=on" makes an impression that we add the
> capability to the device even if it does not have one.
True.
> disable_wake? suppress_wake? clear_wake? wake_allowed?
Let's have a look at what the property does:
>> > Signed-off-by: Yuri Benditovich <yuri.benditovich@daynix.com>
>> > ---
>> > hw/usb/redirect.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>> > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/hw/usb/redirect.c b/hw/usb/redirect.c
>> > index e0f5ca6f81..e95898fe80 100644
>> > --- a/hw/usb/redirect.c
>> > +++ b/hw/usb/redirect.c
>> > @@ -113,6 +113,7 @@ struct USBRedirDevice {
>> > /* Properties */
>> > CharBackend cs;
>> > bool enable_streams;
>> > + bool suppress_remote_wake;
>> > uint8_t debug;
>> > int32_t bootindex;
>> > char *filter_str;
>> > @@ -1989,6 +1990,23 @@ static void usbredir_control_packet(void *priv, uint64_t id,
>> > memcpy(dev->dev.data_buf, data, data_len);
>> > }
>> > p->actual_length = len;
>> > + /*
>> > + * If this is GET_DESCRIPTOR request for configuration descriptor,
>> > + * remove 'remote wakeup' flag from it to prevent idle power down
>> > + * in Windows guest
>> > + */
>> > + if (dev->suppress_remote_wake &&
>> > + control_packet->requesttype == USB_DIR_IN &&
>> > + control_packet->request == USB_REQ_GET_DESCRIPTOR &&
>> > + control_packet->value == (USB_DT_CONFIG << 8) &&
>> > + control_packet->index == 0 &&
>> > + /* bmAttributes field of config descriptor */
>> > + len > 7 && (dev->dev.data_buf[7] & USB_CFG_ATT_WAKEUP)) {
>> > + DPRINTF("Removed remote wake %04X:%04X\n",
>> > + dev->device_info.vendor_id,
>> > + dev->device_info.product_id);
>> > + dev->dev.data_buf[7] &= ~USB_CFG_ATT_WAKEUP;
>> > + }
If the property is true, and this is a GET_DESCRIPTOR control packet
with USB_CFG_ATT_WAKEUP bit set, unset it. Correct?
Assuming it is: "suppress_wakup" feels okay to me.
Whatever we pick, I recommend naming the USBRedirDevice member like the
property. It's currently named @suppress_remote_wake.
>> > usb_generic_async_ctrl_complete(&dev->dev, p);
>> > }
>> > free(data);
>> > @@ -2530,6 +2548,7 @@ static Property usbredir_properties[] = {
>> > DEFINE_PROP_UINT8("debug", USBRedirDevice, debug, usbredirparser_warning),
>> > DEFINE_PROP_STRING("filter", USBRedirDevice, filter_str),
>> > DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("streams", USBRedirDevice, enable_streams, true),
>> > + DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("nowake", USBRedirDevice, suppress_remote_wake, true),
>> > DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
>> > };
>>
>> The default is .nowake=on. Is that a guest-visible change? Do we need
>> compat properties to keep it off for existing machine types?
>
> Guest will see the device as one without 'remote wake' capability.
> IMO, in the worst case this does not change anything, in the best case
> this will suppress device power transition to D2 and the device will
> work.
> Including existing machine types.
> Probably I did not understand the idea of 'compat property', can you
> please provide an example of some existing compat property?
> And, of course, we can keep existing behavior by default and advise to
> turn this property on to make these devices work.
Guest-visible changes require care. Consider:
* Live migration
This is meant to be transparent to the guest, even when we migrate to
a different version of QEMU. Guest-visible hardware changes are
no-no.
* Cold reboot ("dead" migration)
Guests should cope with hardware changes on cold reboot.
Nevertheless, users do not appreciate surprise changes, so we better
control them. Also, the Windows reactivation spectre lurks.
Our general rule is to keep the guest ABI stable for released machine
types, and change it only in the latest, not-yet-released machine type.
To achieve this, we guard the change by a device property, which
defaults to the new behavior (your patch does that already). We use
compat properties to flip the default to old behavior for released
machine types.
We occasionally make exceptions for sufficiently harmless guest-visible
changes. If you think yours is, make your case in your commit message.
Example: USB device property "full-path"
hw/usb/bus.c has
static Property usb_props[] = {
DEFINE_PROP_STRING("port", USBDevice, port_path),
DEFINE_PROP_STRING("serial", USBDevice, serial),
---> DEFINE_PROP_BIT("full-path", USBDevice, flags,
---> USB_DEV_FLAG_FULL_PATH, true),
DEFINE_PROP_BIT("msos-desc", USBDevice, flags,
USB_DEV_FLAG_MSOS_DESC_ENABLE, true),
DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST()
};
The property is on by default. We flip the default to off for machine
type pc-1.0 and older:
static void pc_i440fx_1_0_machine_options(MachineClass *m)
{
static GlobalProperty compat[] = {
PC_CPU_MODEL_IDS("1.0")
{ TYPE_ISA_FDC, "check_media_rate", "off" },
{ "virtio-balloon-pci", "class", stringify(PCI_CLASS_MEMORY_RAM) },
{ "apic-common", "vapic", "off" },
---> { TYPE_USB_DEVICE, "full-path", "no" },
};
pc_i440fx_1_1_machine_options(m);
m->hw_version = "1.0";
compat_props_add(m->compat_props, compat, G_N_ELEMENTS(compat));
}
Done in commit eeb0cf9abf "usb/vmstate: add parent dev path" (v1.1.0).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-27 9:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-26 21:22 [PATCH] usbredir: remove 'remote wake' capability from configuration descriptor Yuri Benditovich
2019-11-27 6:35 ` Markus Armbruster
2019-11-27 7:36 ` Yuri Benditovich
2019-11-27 9:29 ` Markus Armbruster [this message]
2019-11-27 9:40 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2019-11-27 10:49 ` Yuri Benditovich
2019-11-27 16:38 ` Gerd Hoffmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87lfs1hdlp.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org \
--to=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=yan@daynix.com \
--cc=yuri.benditovich@daynix.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).