From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59955) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c2dwR-0000y2-RA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 Nov 2016 08:49:56 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c2dwR-0001vS-7F for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 Nov 2016 08:49:55 -0400 From: Juan Quintela In-Reply-To: <1471343175-14945-4-git-send-email-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> (Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy's message of "Tue, 16 Aug 2016 13:26:00 +0300") References: <1471343175-14945-1-git-send-email-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> <1471343175-14945-4-git-send-email-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> Reply-To: quintela@redhat.com Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2016 13:49:44 +0100 Message-ID: <87lgwzo1ef.fsf@emacs.mitica> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 03/18] migration: split common postcopy out of ram postcopy List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, armbru@redhat.com, eblake@redhat.com, famz@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com, amit.shah@redhat.com, mreitz@redhat.com, kwolf@redhat.com, peter.maydell@linaro.org, dgilbert@redhat.com, den@openvz.org, jsnow@redhat.com, lirans@il.ibm.com Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote: > Split common postcopy staff from ram postcopy staff. > > Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy > diff --git a/migration/savevm.c b/migration/savevm.c > index d2efeeb..cce542f 100644 > --- a/migration/savevm.c > +++ b/migration/savevm.c > @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ static struct mig_cmd_args { > [MIG_CMD_INVALID] = { .len = -1, .name = "INVALID" }, > [MIG_CMD_OPEN_RETURN_PATH] = { .len = 0, .name = "OPEN_RETURN_PATH" }, > [MIG_CMD_PING] = { .len = sizeof(uint32_t), .name = "PING" }, > - [MIG_CMD_POSTCOPY_ADVISE] = { .len = 16, .name = "POSTCOPY_ADVISE" }, > + [MIG_CMD_POSTCOPY_ADVISE] = { .len = -1, .name = "POSTCOPY_ADVISE" }, Not sure if it is a good idea to change postcopy_advise or create a new one. Dave, can you comment?