From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57296) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bw37B-0000RR-Gw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2016 04:17:46 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bw376-0000Wb-CB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2016 04:17:45 -0400 Received: from mail-lf0-x231.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c07::231]:34461) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bw375-0000WD-Qw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2016 04:17:40 -0400 Received: by mail-lf0-x231.google.com with SMTP id b81so273002137lfe.1 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2016 01:17:39 -0700 (PDT) References: <1476214861-31658-1-git-send-email-rth@twiddle.net> <20161016223837.GB5587@flamenco> From: Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?= In-reply-to: <20161016223837.GB5587@flamenco> Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 09:17:35 +0100 Message-ID: <87lgxnfkyo.fsf@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 00/35] cmpxchg-based emulation of atomics List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Emilio G. Cota" Cc: Richard Henderson , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Emilio G. Cota writes: > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 14:40:26 -0500, Richard Henderson wrote: >> Sixth time is the charm, right? This time I'm certain that it >> compiles with centos6, and contains the previously missing update >> from Emilio to atomic_add-bench. > > For patches 03-16 (including the elusive patch 06 for which I reviewed 1bfe0cdf8 > from your atomic-4 branch on github): > > Reviewed-by: Emilio G. Cota > > I just tested the patchset by running concurrencykit's ck_pr regression test (which > tests lock'ed ops) for [guest-on-host bits, all x86] 64-on-64, 32-on-32 and > 64-on-32. I ran it with TCG debugging enabled. It passes all tests. How odd, did you not see the double temp free for target-arm/translate.c? > > I also checked (on x86_64 for several target architectures) that all patches > build OK. > > Thanks, > > Emilio -- Alex Bennée