From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51891) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z71J9-000364-0Z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 08:58:40 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z71J5-0005Tz-Pr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 08:58:38 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-f48.google.com ([74.125.82.48]:36772) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z71J5-0005Tk-KQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 08:58:35 -0400 Received: by wguu7 with SMTP id u7so68599251wgu.3 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 05:58:34 -0700 (PDT) References: From: Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?= In-reply-to: Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 13:59:12 +0100 Message-ID: <87lhfb99wf.fsf@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] TCG baremetal tests repo List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alexander Spyridakis Cc: mttcg@listserver.greensocs.com, Alvise Rigo , Mark Burton , QEMU Developers , KONRAD =?utf-8?B?RnLDqWTDqXJpYw==?= Alexander Spyridakis writes: > Hello all, > > You can find the latest tcg atomic test payload in the following repo: >> git clone >https://git.virtualopensystems.com/dev/tcg_baremetal_tests.git Both git and Chrome complain about your SSL certificates btw. > > You also need an arm baremetal cross-compiler like arm-none-gnueabi- (arm) > and the usual aarch64-linux-gnu- (arm64). Due to a PSCI bug in the current > multithreading tcg repo, the atomic test was modified to work also on the > vexpress machine model. > > To run it: >> make vexpress (or virt/virt64 for other targets) >> ../mttcg/arm-softmmu/qemu-system-arm -nographic -M vexpress-a15 -kernel > build-vexpress/image-vexpress.axf -smp 4 > > On my machine it takes around 30 seconds for one run of the test and the > results vary from as low as 5 to 30 errors per vCPU per 10 million > iterations (no errors with KVM). It is also very interesting to note, that > the current test finishes faster on upstream qemu than multithreaded > qemu. Interesting. Thanks for putting the tests online. > > Best regards. -- Alex Bennée