From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47899)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1URohB-0006zH-8T
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 15:04:06 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1URoh7-0001rE-8U
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 15:04:05 -0400
Received: from mail-qc0-x234.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c01::234]:33326)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1URoh7-0001qz-3s
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 15:04:01 -0400
Received: by mail-qc0-f180.google.com with SMTP id b40so442923qcq.25
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 12:04:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
In-Reply-To: <20130415182358.GF26210@smtp.vpn>
References: <20130415182358.GF26210@smtp.vpn>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 14:03:57 -0500
Message-ID: <87li8jsjj6.fsf@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] QTest with TCG?
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: "Edgar E. Iglesias" <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

"Edgar E. Iglesias" <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com> writes:

> Hi,
>
> I would like to use qtest for testing hw-models in combination with firmware.
>
> At the moment I'm using the following patch to allow qtest to run without
> accel=qtest. I'm mostly interested in the mem access functions and the
> interrupt interception. I guess time stepping wouldnt work without
> accel=qtest, but maybe that could be an acceptable limitation.
>
> Is there anything in principle with such a setup that would cause
> problems?

Interesting.  No, I can't think of any problems in principle with doing
this.  It was not a use case I had considered.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

>
> Thanks,
> Edgar
>
>
> commit 947414a56e256139a510a034c02ac277ad577272
> Author: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com>
> Date:   Wed Apr 10 20:32:17 2013 +0200
>
>     Allow qtest to be used together with a virtual CPU
>     
>     Signed-off-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com>
>
> diff --git a/vl.c b/vl.c
> index c566caf..0dbac29 100644
> --- a/vl.c
> +++ b/vl.c
> @@ -4143,6 +4143,10 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv, char **envp)
>  
>      configure_accelerator();
>  
> +    if (!qtest_enabled() && qtest_chrdev) {
> +        qtest_init();
> +    }
> +
>      machine_opts = qemu_opts_find(qemu_find_opts("machine"), 0);
>      if (machine_opts) {
>          kernel_filename = qemu_opt_get(machine_opts, "kernel");