From: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
To: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dave@treblig.org>,
peterx@redhat.com, Alexey Perevalov <a.perevalov@samsung.com>,
Juraj Marcin <jmarcin@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/13] migration/postcopy: Make all blocktime vars 64bits
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2025 17:42:52 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87msap50z7.fsf@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250527231248.1279174-5-peterx@redhat.com>
Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> writes:
> I am guessing it was used to be 32bits because of the atomic ops. Now all
> the atomic ops are gone and we're protected by a mutex instead, it's ok we
> can switch to 64 bits.
>
> Reasons to move over:
>
> - Allow further patches to change the unit from ms to us: with postcopy
> preempt mode, we're really into hundreds of microseconds level on
> blocktime. We'd better be able to trap those.
>
> - This also paves way for some other tricks that the original version
> used to avoid overflows, e.g., start_time was almost only useful before
> to make sure the sampled timestamp won't overflow a 32-bit field.
>
> - This prepares further reports on top of existing data collected,
> e.g. average page fault latencies. When average operation is taken into
> account, milliseconds are simply too coarse grained.
>
> When at it:
>
> - Rename page_fault_vcpu_time to vcpu_blocktime_start.
>
> - Rename vcpu_blocktime to vcpu_blocktime_total.
>
> - Touch up the trace-events to not dump blocktime ctx pointer
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-02 20:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-27 23:12 [PATCH 00/13] migration/postcopy: Blocktime tracking overhaul Peter Xu
2025-05-27 23:12 ` [PATCH 01/13] migration: Add option to set postcopy-blocktime Peter Xu
2025-06-02 16:50 ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-05-27 23:12 ` [PATCH 02/13] migration/postcopy: Push blocktime start/end into page req mutex Peter Xu
2025-06-02 17:46 ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-05-27 23:12 ` [PATCH 03/13] migration/postcopy: Drop all atomic ops in blocktime feature Peter Xu
2025-06-02 18:00 ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-05-27 23:12 ` [PATCH 04/13] migration/postcopy: Make all blocktime vars 64bits Peter Xu
2025-06-02 20:42 ` Fabiano Rosas [this message]
2025-05-27 23:12 ` [PATCH 05/13] migration/postcopy: Drop PostcopyBlocktimeContext.start_time Peter Xu
2025-06-03 15:52 ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-06-03 15:55 ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-05-27 23:12 ` [PATCH 06/13] migration/postcopy: Bring blocktime layer to us level Peter Xu
2025-06-03 15:54 ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-05-27 23:12 ` [PATCH 07/13] migration/postcopy: Add blocktime fault counts per-vcpu Peter Xu
2025-06-03 15:59 ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-05-27 23:12 ` [PATCH 08/13] migration/postcopy: Report fault latencies in blocktime Peter Xu
2025-06-02 9:26 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-06-02 16:29 ` Peter Xu
2025-06-03 16:07 ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-05-27 23:12 ` [PATCH 09/13] migration/postcopy: Initialize blocktime context only until listen Peter Xu
2025-06-03 16:08 ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-05-27 23:12 ` [PATCH 10/13] migration/postcopy: Cache the tid->vcpu mapping for blocktime Peter Xu
2025-06-03 16:20 ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-05-27 23:12 ` [PATCH 11/13] migration/postcopy: Cleanup the total blocktime accounting Peter Xu
2025-06-03 16:22 ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-05-27 23:12 ` [PATCH 12/13] migration/postcopy: Optimize blocktime fault tracking with hashtable Peter Xu
2025-06-03 16:44 ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-05-27 23:12 ` [PATCH 13/13] migration/postcopy: blocktime allows track / report non-vCPU faults Peter Xu
2025-06-03 16:50 ` Fabiano Rosas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87msap50z7.fsf@suse.de \
--to=farosas@suse.de \
--cc=a.perevalov@samsung.com \
--cc=dave@treblig.org \
--cc=jmarcin@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).